Orange County NC Website
$ i;~ ~ <br />5. All sites designated PTC-2 shall have direct access to a street <br />classified either as an arterial or collector as de3ignated by the <br />adopted Land Use Plan. <br />'~ The subject property has direct access on NC 34 which is <br />classified as an arterial by the adopted Land Use Plan. <br />Ric}; Cannity, representative for the developer, indicated that retail <br />sales on the site vacs the intended use. <br />Coutu indicated that he had received citizen requests to hold the public <br />hearing open for their letters. <br />Gordan suggested continuing the L`x~blic hearing in April. <br />t^Thitted questioned holding the public hearing oven to receive citizen <br />letters. Coutu e:cplained the citizens vaere unable to attend the meeting. <br />ti^fiitted felt to honor the citizen's request vrould set a precedent, and was not <br />convinced the request was warranted. <br />Gordon e.:pressed concern about new Planning Board public hearing procedure <br />regarding acceptinc substa*~tive caa~m~ent after the public hearing and <br />recoru:~ended that the public hearing be held open. <br />Cannity stated the applicant submitted the request on time and that the <br />Boards proceed with the decision along the calendar already established. <br />Gordon e~.pressed concern about no staff preliminary presentation and the <br />late receipt of the agenda packets by the Planning Board. <br />~~lhitted felt that the Board would be setting a bad precedent and would <br />confuse the record by holding the ~lic hearing open to receive additional <br />co~rnents. Marshall relt the public hearing should be kept open far the <br />Planning Board to study the natter. Collins responded to Gordon's comment <br />that the Planning Board had receives the essential information in a tir.~ly <br />manner. <br />There was Board consensus that the item be referred to the Planning Board <br />without holding the public hearing open for additional citizen comment. The <br />public hearing cues continued until April 2, 1984 to receive the Planning <br />Board's recomriendation. <br />- I 4'~ '7$- g <br />The proposed amendment was requested by Fick Cannity on behalf of his <br />client, Mr. Vernon Davis. P~Tr. Davis has requested rezoning of a 2,.35 acre <br />tract to NC-2 for the purpose of developing a used car dealership. (See <br />permanent agenda file fora copy of the letter). One correction to the <br />content should be notes: - motor vehicle maintenance and repair (body shop) is <br />~ allowed. <br />Amend Section 4.3 (S25) ~ by adding "Aiotar Vehicles <br />Sales/Rental (New and Used)" to the list of permitted uses in the NC-2 <br />D?eighborhhood Commercial-2 zoning district. <br />"P•lotor Vehicle 5ales/1?ental (New and Used)" are currently permitted only <br />in the GC-~ (General Com~ercial-~) anc EC-5 (57tisting Commercial-S) zoning <br />districts. <br />Tne intent of the Ateighborhood Commercial NC-2 District is to provide..... <br />sites far limited corn:ercial uses designed to serve a population at the neigh- <br />borhood and rural leve' with convenience goods and personal services. New and <br />used dealerships are not normally associated with neighborhood service areas. <br />Rowever, rural areas have traditionally had such establishrerts (particularly <br />used cars), as well as body shops, to provide service to the farm .and rural <br />non-farm residents. .each establishr,~nts are also smaller in size vaath opera- <br />tions scaled to the surrounding service area. <br />