Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
3 <br />Cor.~ussioner ~7alker sugeested all six (6) items be tabled and <br />placed on the agenda far February 27, 1984. <br />Commissioner t~.arshall sugcested that the items requesting staff <br />support be evaluated during the ne::t two weelcs for understanding -and im- <br />alementation. <br />4. ,Land Use Plan Ra,~nort (see permanent agenda file for a copy <br />of this report) <br />- Planner Susan Smith trade the presentation of the annual .report <br />which is required under the Procedures for Amending the Ind Use Plan <br />._. _, adopted by the Board of Conmissioners on Novenber 1, 1982. The report <br />addressed (1) issues, (2) future planning activities, (3) proposed <br />amendments, and (~) a development summary. The Planning Board endorsed <br />the report. <br />Commissioner G7i1].hoit martioned the tension in Chapel Hill with <br />regard to the Lnfill Policy and density and pointed out that Infill goes <br />not need to be of high density. The Infill policy in joint planning <br />provides far the orderly development from the town out which would <br />discourage leapfroging over undeveloped land. Iie requested from the <br />Plannning Staff (1) ur~date on this policy and how it afFects the tovm and <br />County, and (2) an update report on the impact of nutrient sensitive <br />classification on package plants. t~'illhoit thanked and commended Susan <br />Smith on the annual 2-year report. <br />5. Resx~onse to Section 8 t~ianaaement R2yieco <br />County Manager Thompson presented the County's response to a <br />P7anagement Review of the Section 8 F~:isting Housing Assistance Program. <br />C. ~'~75 FOR DF'CISIDAT ~' <br />1. ~J11:1~,$A~TTLHQI~a Cade ~s Revised <br />Comr:iissioner i~rhitted moved, Commissioner Marshall seconded <br />approval for the adoption of the Minimum Housing Code with the changes <br />that were recommmended by the FtSAC on section 12.5, 5.1, and 5.2. <br />Comr;iissioner Lloyd made a r;ntion to add an amendment to include <br />striking that portion in Article 6 which was not included in the original <br />motion. <br />Commissioner Vlhitted opposed the amendment stating that some <br />standaras need to be set in these areas that are indicated in Article G <br />and if a temperature of 6$ degrees cannot be obtained by a heating <br />system, it would indicate a serious deficiency in the unit that probably <br />should be corrected. <br />Commissioner t~'iarshall indicated that the law says these systems <br />are designed to do this and takes into affect the average temperatures in <br />this area. <br />would take into consideration the tanperature ranges in the area and <br />-.. those systems capable of maintaining the temperature range. <br />Corunissioner Lloyd recommended changing Article 6 to read "temper- <br />ature deemed acceptable to the tenant". <br />VCii~: ON ~~_,~y~tT' Ayes, 2; Noes, 3 (GGillhoit, Marshall and <br />t~hitted ) <br />voT~ _~ra THE oRrrrrr~~ rhra- Ayes, 4; Noes 1 (Lloyd). Cormmissioner <br />Lloyd, while in favor of the t•Iiri~m Housing Code felt that Article 6 <br />with reference to temperature placed an undue burden on the owner. . <br />2. apposed 5ala_~ [•Tometco,_~~hln TV,_ Tn~_ <br />Corm-issianer T•7hitted moved, Commissioner t-~rshall seconded <br />~~~ <br />