Orange County NC Website
~~u <br />4 <br />provide the f~:nc,s and the twa school boards as to how they use their <br />~sL+~ua1 allocation. <br />Br. Lunsforo. noted they have a roofing consultant from <br />Charlotte and he alzeady authorized specifications far the roof at Orange <br />High funding either with available funds or with sufficient appropri- <br />ations in the upconing budget. I3e requested a resolution that the moray <br />caould be fort_hcorti.ng so that the contract can be let and the [aorlc can <br />begin on July 1, 1984. He r:~ntioned in response to the suggestion of a <br />countywide survey that all information would be appreciated in helping <br />the School. Board set priorities. <br />Chairman T•Tillhoit yr 11 work with the County tlanager and the <br />two blaperintendens of Schools to determine if there vrould be a savings of <br />money by having an audit completed or, all the roofs and working together <br />to set priorities. <br />Cvrmissioner Llcyd requested addit7ional in£oz'rnotion before <br />rrakinc a decision, indicating an agreement needs to be reached bet[veen <br />all concerned parties. <br />Commissioner [•7illhoit reiterated that. prior engineering <br />appraisal work on the roofs will be utilized. Kennedy invited the Board <br />of Cormussioners to met with their consulting engineer to view the <br />program they have under[aay. <br />After further discussion the county manager caas requested to <br />schedule a n>eeting betTaeen the County Commissioners and the ~[ao School <br />Boards with the consulting firms. <br />~, S~1 pG am TT_r,P rC'ax <br />Commissioner T•7i11hoit e,;plained the tax and noted it would <br />help avoid an increase in property taxes. tie requested the Board to con- <br />sider a public hearing on the question of whether or not to enact and <br />levy the tax. The tax will provide the follov~ing estimated income: <br />Hillsborough S 47,000 <br />Chapel Hi11 SQ84,000 <br />Carrboro 5130,000 <br />'~.ebane S 5,600 <br />Commissicner [Tillhoit noted that if the Sales and Use Tai; <br />would be put an as a referendum, it could not be presented until August <br />or September. F1so the cost of a referendum would be substantial, and <br />too late for consideration for the budget. tae recommended a public <br />hearing be held or. the one half cent sales and use ta:; on t,arch 5 and be <br />placed on the agenda for decision on ttarch 13, 1984. <br />--- Commissioner Wil].hoit novel, Commissioner E4arshall seconded <br />approval for a public hearing or, the one half cent sales and use tax to <br />be hel:: on starch 5, 198a and placed on the agenda for decision on I~rch <br />13, 1984. <br />V(7TE: iIP~dTN1Oi]S. <br />4. F ~ ~ a <br />.F.or Ef1a.Zr.~ s?yrzr <br />i;i^ Fisher, consulting engineer with the John R. t~cAdams <br />Conpany, gave an overview of the two engineering reports: (1) Upper ~7ia <br />