Browse
Search
Minutes - 19840123
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1984
>
Minutes - 19840123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:14:14 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:40:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/1984
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o~~ <br />a <br />Area which can reasonably be anne::ed by a riunicipality in the ensuing 10-20 <br />years. <br />(2) t'~ater and set•:er lines should e~:ist at the site or be assured of <br />installation as pant of the deveiopraent process. <br />(3) Vehicular access must consist of direct access to a street classified <br />as either arterial or collector as r:esign2ted by the adopted Land Use Plan. <br />(n) The full range of urban services e:;ist or are proposed at the tine of <br />the development including fire, police, recreation, education, corcmercial ar,d <br />cultural activities. <br />As indicated previously, the property in cuestior. has been designated as <br />10-Year Transition in the Land Use Plan by action of the Board of Commissioners <br />in I•iarch 19E3. <br />~'he property noes not have "direct access" to the North Carolina Highway <br />86, a route which has peen designated as an "arterial" in the Land Use x'lan. <br />Access to the site is by way of existing or proposed residential streets W:11Ch <br />traverse Y:ildwood Subdivision. A requirement that the portion. of the proposes <br />Oakdale Drive Extension adjacent to the development be reserved, and subsecyuent <br />construction, of the same, trould provide access <long--term) to a "collector" <br />street approved as part of the Central Crange Land Use Plan. <br />j•~ater and setaer lines have been or are being extended to serve the <br />property. Initial service t:ould be provided by way of an e~:tension of a six <br />inch tuater line from baildvrood Subdivision Phase I. Staff proposes that a 12 <br />inch line to be extended to ;}ildwood Subdivision-Phase TI be etended to serve <br />latter phaSe5 of tiarapton Dovrns and provide a complete loop system with better <br />water pressure. <br />Sewer lines are available to serve the site, and they e~:tenci along the <br />entire eastern boundary of the project. These lines connect to a pump station <br />located near F7ilmore Electronics. <br />Police and fire protection t•:ould be provided by the Orange Courtin <br />Sheriff's Department and the Orange Rural Fire Distzict respectively. No <br />problems in providing service to the development are anticipated, provided fire <br />hydrants are installed. <br />In terms cf the impact on schools, development of the property at P,-8 <br />densities could result. in as many as 190 new students. All schools serving the <br />proposed development would be impacated, including Grady-Brown Elementary, <br />Stanford Jr. Hich, Stanback diddle School, and Orange High School. <br />The LUT. or Land Use Intensity System comes into play on this rec,+u est. <br />Specifically, it applies to all projects located in R-5, R-8 or R-13 zoning <br />districts. It a~}plies because of the high-density nature of sucri ~:rojects and <br />sets standards for open space, recreation, liveability, and building spacing. <br />These .standards lave been met with one e:;ception. The applicant is required to <br />provide 1.25 acres of recreational space for the use of the residents. I~iore <br />than tY-,at amount has been designated on the plan, but it includes an access <br />easement specifically required as part of the Glildtvood Subdivision development. <br />Since it was required for that site and is not a part of the Hampton Dotens <br />development, it cannot be counted in the acreage figure. <br />Another problem faith the recreation space provided is the applicant has <br />included pedestrian paths and t•:alkways in the area calculation. Specific <br />designations as to which tralkways are included for recreational purposes must <br />be shovan on the site plan and revised area cor,~putatiors provided. <br />As shown it is unclear as to whether t•~alks between parking areas anc, <br />buildings have been included. Such walks trould not be counted as meetinn <br />rcr-raai-inr~, ; grace reci:iremen.ts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.