Browse
Search
Minutes - 19840123
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1984
>
Minutes - 19840123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:14:14 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:40:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/1984
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U~~ <br />z <br />extended public sewer service into the New Hope Creel: sub-basin at this time. <br />Ertensian of seraer service Trill require decision as to the appropriateness, <br />desareability Gnd feGsibality of extending services into a new sub-basin on a <br />pump system basis. Given the presence of Nozthwoods subdivision, an <br />industrially zoned tract, two corsiercially zoned tract and considerable <br />development interest in the Eubanks/NC 86 area, the issue of servicancl a neer <br />sub-basic. neecs to be considered seriously. Mince water service could easily <br />-- be provided, oI9ASA has indicated that at is preferable to e~:tend water and <br />sewer services at the same tare, rather tY~an allow for disjointed service <br />provision. However, Oi•7ASA at this time is not interested in financing sucY, <br />service- ~::~~nsion, but would look favorably on the extension of lines by a <br />developer to serve a given area so long as the line site and location meet <br />OWASA criteria. <br />The area under consideration fronts on Eubanks Road which is a paved state <br />maintained secondary road. The remainder of the tract fronts on NC 86. The <br />portion under consideration 'ras access to NC 86, which is an arterial road, <br />from Eubanks Road. The proposed construction of 2-~0 will require the <br />acquisition of the eastern portion of the original tract for the right-of-tvay <br />for T-40 and also the realignment of Eubanks P.oad at the I-~0/IIC 86 <br />interchange. <br />E~cistang land uses in the area include the following: to the nori.h, <br />undeveloped land and 2-nQ, to the east, single family residential units and <br />1-90; to the 50uth, Northvroods subdivision, a subdivision of single zanily <br />units, a chuck and undeveloped land; to the west undeveloped land, a warehouse <br />facility, an undeveloped andustri~lly zoned tract and the County landfill. <br />Considerable residential and commercial development has and as continuing to <br />take place to the south cf the area along NC 86 and teTeaver Dairy Road. The <br />area south of the proposes alignment of I-~40 is facinc, considerable development <br />pressures and is clearly in transition from rural or low-density uses to urban <br />and higher density uses, particularly as a result of the proposed presence of <br />the interstai:e interchange immediately to the south. At present the population <br />density of the area north and west of Eubanks Road remains very low density; <br />however, the density of the urea in the ti•~eaver Dairy Road area to the south <br />east is moderate to high and will continue to increase in density. The absence <br />of population Brest of the tract is most likely due to the presence of the <br />county landfill and the Southern Railroad line. The density of Northwoods to <br />the south as one unit the acre on a cor:~r:unity water system and indavic:ual <br />septic tanks and is already established. <br />Two other consaderGtions need to be made in evaluating the araendment <br />recuest. The first consideration is that at the time the Land Use 1?lan was <br />develaed and adopted the County was still in litigation with .the State over the <br />proposed alignment of X-n0 through Orange County. The Land Use Plan categories <br />for the area under consideration reflect planning criteria e.hich cad not fully <br />recognize the presence of the 5-40 corridor immediately east and north of tY:e <br />tract. <br />The second consideration is that as part of their final, activati.es the <br />.joint Planning Corunission recorunended that given the trencr in development <br />patterns around the Torrns of Chapel Bill and Carrboro that the Ten Year <br />Transition F~rea be extended north to the edge of the Rural >;ufzer and the <br />Tv,=enty Year Transition Area b2 shifted sau~h of the Towr. of Chpel I3i11. iJo <br />action was taken on the recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.