Browse
Search
Minutes - 19831128
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Minutes - 19831128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 11:18:07 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:39:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/28/1983
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-28-1983
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
03 <br /> 3 <br /> Susan Smith requested consideration of C-2 and C-3 together. (see pages Lq <br /> of this book) Susan Smith presented the item, reviewing each of the,/-,/ <br /> proposed districts and the requirements of each of the districts. <br /> Valerie Carter, President of the League of Women Voters of Chapel. <br /> Hill--Carrboro, reported that on May 5, 1953 at the annual meeting, the League <br /> of Women Voters adopted a study on water quality to reach a consensus on <br /> issues and actions that would assure and protect the quality of the drinking <br /> water. Regulations should be adopted at the local level to protect the water <br /> quality and water supply in Orange County. The League of Women Voters urged <br /> adoption of these land use plan text amendments .for identifying and regulating <br /> land development in the water quality critical watershed areas in Orange <br /> County. <br /> Lindsey Efland questioned the two acres standard and the provision for road <br /> frontage, stating .that most industries are located on at least ten acres of <br /> land; the requirements for screening large parking lots is unreasonable; <br /> restrictions on business should be reviewed because most businesses that come <br /> into our area are small, and we must not regulate the small businesses out of <br /> existence. <br /> Max Kennedy, local contractor, expressed his concern for those people who <br /> want to build homes or start businesses in Orange County: the goal is to <br /> provide adequate, reasonable, safe, and suitable housing and the wording of the <br /> documents seem to prohibit that; the 6% required of impervious areas is <br /> excessive; the language in 9.3 prohibiting public water and sewer services. <br /> Gordon Brown, resident of Chapel Hill, spoke in opposition: the land use <br /> plan assumes: (1) the 7-mile creek reservoir will be built, (2) technology <br /> will not advance through the years so that industrial land use would become <br /> compatible with good drinking water, (3) the economic needs of the township <br /> will not someday outweigh the interest of other parts of the County in terms of <br /> what it wants to do with its own land, (4) that planners are able to forecast <br /> the economic development in this particular areas over the next twenty years, <br /> (5) by locking off this area into a highly restricted mode of development that <br /> the land will increase in value. He made note of the fact that there are to <br /> be no lines in the water critical area and/or in areas where the minimum <br /> residential lot size is two acres. He made a legal comment, noting that the <br /> ony way to accomplish the task is to create a water quality critical area as a <br /> special area of concern or special overlay that is in a district in itself. <br /> Within the designated special overlay, that it would be appropriate for people <br /> requesting zoning or use consideration, to have to address concerns regarding <br /> water quality as is normally done under a special use or conditional use <br /> program and thus considered on a case by case basis. <br /> Margaret Holton, LVTV-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Task Force expressed concerns <br /> about the protection of the water supply and the actions that need to be taken <br /> now to protect the future of the water supply in Orange County. Once <br /> pollution has taken place, it is very hard to clean up so that development <br /> should take place away from the critical areas. She supports the <br /> recommendations. <br /> Mr. Efland asked if there was any consideration for underindustriai <br /> development as there is for residential development and if all developments <br /> would have to be serves: by underground power which would create problems with <br /> the power industry. <br /> Max Kennedy noted that in the study for West Orange, it states that the <br /> power plant would be "operated, and maintained by a public agency," and <br /> nupgtinnn if this creates a conflict. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.