Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 8a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 8a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 11:31:22 AM
Creation date
5/28/2010 1:00:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/1/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-01-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The aforementioned letter only approved <br />identified therein. It did not grant `blanket' <br />plan. <br />the construction of the various buildings <br />approval for all buildings shown on the site <br />There was an apparent understanding that as new building(s) were proposed for <br />construction, additional site plan submittal, review, and approval would be necessary. <br />This includes the payment of applicable Department review fees. <br />5. In 2006 Planning staff and University officials were discussing the need for a revised site <br />plan showing: <br />a. The final location for all proposed, and existing, structures on the property, <br />b. The location of the spray irrigation field areas and other septic field and repair <br />locations, if any, <br />c. All well locations, <br />d. The location of all streams and flood plains on the property, <br />e. The provision of a driveway encroachment agreement from NC DOT for the <br />improvements to the entrance of the property, and <br />f. The location of sediment basins and stormwater detention ponds, <br />The revised site plan (`Phase 2') was deemed necessary as University officials had <br />indicated that modifications were necessary to previously approved structures. In May of <br />2006 a site plan was submitted to the County incorporating these items as requested. <br />According to our records the University was authorized in July of 2006 to move forward <br />with the revised development plans. <br />As with the 2004 site plan, there was no reference to the overall size or design capacity of <br />the septic system on the revised site plan. <br />6. Planning staff has discovered that the existing wastewater disposal system on the <br />property has a design capacity over three thousand (3,000) gallons based on permit <br />records on file with the Orange County Health Department regarding the existing State <br />permitted system. <br />This may have been in response to support the anticipated development of future <br />buildings on the property. <br />7. Section 6.20 of the Ordinance prohibits the location of `ground absorption systems with a <br />design capacity of 3,000 gallons per day or more and package treatment plants for <br />sanitary sewage disposal' without the submittal, review, and issuance of a Class A <br />Special Use Permit in accordance with the provisions of Article Eight (8) or a the <br />submittal, review, and issuance of a Planned Development (PD) rezoning in accordance <br />with Article Seven (7) of the Ordinance. <br />8. During the zoning site inspection, carried out on December 17, 2009, staff noticed <br />inconsistencies with the `Phase 2'. site plan approved in 2006. <br />In answering the University's question relating to the necessary process to review <br />proposed modifications to the previously approved site plan(s), and based on available <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.