Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
62 <br /> 669 Brian Crawford: We still have to recommend it for approval because when we voted as a board,the majority rules so you can <br /> 670 send it along for approval but you can say there was sufficient discussion among the Planning Board of concerns that we would <br /> 671 like to Board of County Commissioners to consider this but we still have to send it along with approval. <br /> 672 <br /> 673 MorioN: Samantha Cabe made a motion to send the text as it is currently amended to the Board of County Commissioners for <br /> 674 approval along with all the maps and include the comments that address the concerns of the Planning Board. Seconded by <br /> 675 Larry Wright. <br /> 676 <br /> 677 Vore:Passed 6—1 (Marcoplos) <br /> 678 <br /> 679 Mark Marcoplos: Let me explain why. As Craig ailuded to earlier when he talked about the ridge line and the movement of the <br /> 680 water,there is enough hydrological uncertainry here that calls into question the criteria and I am not going to vote for something <br /> 681 that is such an abstract motion that we will send it on and we are endorsing something that is not even done yet. It cails into <br /> 682 , question a lot of uncertainty about the definitions and I can't see supporting definitions that would presumably interpreted to say <br /> 683 that donut hole so close to those reservoirs is absolutely okay just as is. <br /> 684 <br /> 685 Brian Crawford: Do we need to do anything for the Land Use Element text and map amendments? <br /> 686 <br /> 687 Craig Benedict: Page 87 is the reiteration. The Land Use definition matches the Zoning definition. This is an excerpt from our <br /> 688 existing comprehensive plan land use element with the text in red and includes similar definitions not there previously. This <br /> 689 describes,in less detail than the zoning code, the critical areas and what a Class 1 and Class 2 reservoir is and then if that is <br /> 690 decided our land use map also reflects the watershed critical areas. <br /> 691 <br /> 692 Samantha Cabe: I wouid like to make one recommendation but it would be helpful if the sections of the zoning ordinance were <br /> 693 cross referenced here because when you are shortening the denser definition there is always the chance of a different <br /> 694 interpretation. I think there needs to be a cross reference. <br /> 695 <br /> 696 Pete Hallenbeck: On page 89 what part of the maps being amended? <br /> 697 <br /> 698 Perdita Holtz: This is the existing map with the old overlay. The new overlay would replace the old overlay. <br /> 699 <br /> 700 Samantha Cabe: So this is not the actual map? <br /> 701 <br /> 702 Perdita Holtz: No. The outline you just recommended with comments is the new overlay. <br /> 703 <br /> 704 Brian Crawford: Any other comments. <br /> 705 <br /> 706 MorioN: Larry Wright made a motion to recommend this to the Board of Counry Commissioners. Seconded by Jeffrey Schmitt. <br /> 707 VoTe:Unanimous <br /> 708 <br /> 709 Craig Benedict: In your packet,there is an item Mary Bobbitt-Cooke asked for about the interconnections between the various <br /> 710 municipalities and counties. <br /> 711 <br /> 712 Larry Wright: There is a small water line that goes into Western Orange County into fhe Buckhorn area. <br /> 713 <br /> 714 Craig Benedict: This was based on what couid use Jordan Lake waters <br /> 715 <br /> 716 ..*......*,.�,,,.*,......,,�;...#.,��#..,..,..�. <br /> 717 <br />