Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 10:19:00 AM
Creation date
5/28/2010 12:52:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/1/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-01-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
ORD-2010-048 Upper Eno Watershed Critical Area - Zoning Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-047a Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan amending boundaries of the watershed critical area overlay districts
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 <br /> 669 <br /> 670 Pete Hailenbeck: I was concerned that the bubble at Panther Branch was an anomaly of the criteria used to define the zones. I <br /> 671 think it is inconsistent to the flow of that creek. <br /> 672 <br /> 673 Mary Bobbitt-Cooke: I wonder how many other third order creeks that haven't been identified. We should have all the third order <br /> 674 creeks identified before we vote on one. <br /> 675 <br /> 676 Craig Benedict: The second one is the two streams,Crabtree Creek and stream 2109 doing a Yz mile buffer on either side of <br /> 677 these streams,one mile from where they enter into Seven Mile Creek. <br /> 678 <br /> 679 Larry Wright: All in favor. <br /> 680 Vote: Unanimous <br /> 681 <br /> 682 Mark Marcoplos: One thing I want to say. <br /> 683 <br /> 684 Larry Wright: Please quickly. <br /> 685 <br /> 686 Mark Marcoplos: I know you all probably don't want to hear this...l think you really do want to hear it... <br /> 687 <br /> 688 Larry Wright: When you do this,say at the beginning that you want additions to the agenda. <br /> 689 <br /> 690 Mark Marcoplos: I will summarize it quickly. We will talk about regional water next month. On page 21, Planning Board <br /> 691 Ordinance Review committee, it talks about the issue of whether we want to preserve all these potential reservoir sites as <br /> 692 reservoir sites because that is a major part of the review. We are basically saying protect some of the sites as natural areas. I <br /> 693 was on the OWASA board for 6�/z years through the droughts,we purchased the quarry when I was on the OWASA board and <br /> 694 that is a major part of the future water supply for Chapel HiIVCarrboro and it was never discussed as being anything other than a <br /> 695 source for Chapel Hill and Carrboro. It is essential to Chapel Hill and Carrboro. In addition to that,one of the major policies that <br /> 696 was enacted while I was on the board was to maximize conservation of our local resources before we went outside the region to <br /> 697 get water because it was apparent to us on the board that we have that capability. We are talking about needing that water in <br /> 698 2035. There was a meeting a couple of months ago that I first heard mentioned that there was any discussion of Orange County <br /> 699 outside the Chapel Hili/Carrboro area getting water from that quarry. Such a major issue and somebody somewhere said to you <br /> 700 that this might happen. We don't need water from Jordan Lake. Chatham Counry needs it, Durham County needs it. Chatham <br /> 701 Counry overreached. They have houses there that plan to be buiit that don't have water. Durham did the same thing. They <br /> 702 want water from Jordan Lake. OWASA has an intake on the west side of Jordan Lake that is a prime intake site. They came to <br /> 703 OWASA and Orange County and said let's all work together because you have what we want,this intake. There is this thing <br /> 704 quietly going on that threatens to regionalize the water. It is a big issue,do we partner with these other municipalities and lose <br /> 705 an incredible utiliry in OWASA. At a Assembiy of Governments meeting last year,I went and gave my statement about it. Many <br /> 706 other elected officials also said to OWASA, this doesn't make sense. We don't think this is a good idea;we have great water, <br /> 707 why should we bail these other jurisdictions that didn't plan very well. OWASA has continued with this process despite the <br /> 708 feedback. <br /> 709 <br /> 710 Craig Benedict: A Mr.Efland did provide an email that was distributed about stream ID 1498,Panther Branch,please read that. <br /> 711 <br /> 712 ..,..,,,.�,,...*.*...�.,.**.�,.�*.....�...,.,,.,*....... <br /> 713 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.