Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 6a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

48 547 548 Craig Benedict: There are two more criteria and we will tet the board decide if you want to finish these two tonight to close the 549 whole discussion or move to some UDO stuff. The two criteria would be adding these streams and adding those streams wouid 550 be another. This can be picked up next month. 551 552 Larry Wright: Is the board's pleasure to continue this and table the UDO for another meeting. 553 , 554 Michael Harvey: I need a decision on one item and a minute or two for the last one. 555 556 Larry Wright: How can we manage this? 557 558 Craig Benedict: Within ten minutes we can wander through these criteria. Then by 9:30 or 9:45 we can address that. 559 560 Earl McKee: I think what we should cover what is on our agenda. 561 562 Mark Marcoplos: I want to speak about one part of this we haven't talked about. I don't have to do that I will be happy to go 563 straight to the Board of Counry Commissioners with what I am going to say. I am going to give you a 30 second to one minute 564 preview. I am either going to do the five to eight minute thing here or I am going to do it for the Board of Counry Commissioners. I 565 r' ' ' hi n f rth rd r streams that flow directf into Class I reservoirs Lake Ben 566 Craig Benedict: Second to the last c iteria, is t rd a d ou o e y 567 Johnson, this is a third order stream, this might be a fourth order stream that flows into Corporation Lake. This one was 568 completely covered by the 1994 Watershed map, not the definition. Any contamination that occurs in the stream that is just a 569 mile problem,Ciass I reservoir,we thought that was important. Was it 2�/z miles Perdita? 570 571 Perdita Holtz: I think it was 1 '/z miles. 572 573 Craig Benedict: This criterion is third and fourth order streams flowing directly into a Class I reservoir. That only involves Rocky 574 Run,which was not included in the 1994 description. The one here was completely part of the 1994 line no change to the line in 575 that area. In this area we are including probably 700 acres more into the critical area than was in 1994. The density is roughly 576 two acres per unit. 577 578 Ea�i McKee: When we are talking order streams,is this our definition,a county definition or state defined. 579 580 Craig Benedict: This is a national definition. The definitions are in the packet. 581 582 Mark Marcopios: We can't go wrong protecting the water. We could go wrong not protecting it. 583 584 Mary Bobbitt-Cooke: I live in this area;I have to say I was surprised that Rocky Run was not protected. We are very glad to see 585 that new bubble added out here. It does make sense to have it there. 586 587 Larry Wright: Other comments. 588 589 Craig Benedict: You are voting on including these two streams in the critical area definition, Rocky Run, 1 �/z miles up,one half 590 mile on either side of that stream and including them in the critical area definition. 591 592 Larry Wright: All in favor? 593 Vote: Unanimous 594 595 Larry Wright: Carries. Next point. 596 597 Craig Benedict: This is the last criteria. You see four different streams come into the picture here. The stream might be ID 598 2109; Crabtree Creek are two streams that used to flow into this Seven Mile Creek reservoir. Those were being protected 599 previously because of that future reservoir site. This stream parallels,comes from the Eno,Dry Run Creek that comes up here 600 and in a previous program you could see it was being protected also. I can say there is a difference I have been researching , 601 more recently,the difference beiween these two streams and these two streams. This reservoir was quite confined,there wasn't 602 too many bubbles on the outside we think it should have been bubbled out a little even in 1994. In talking to residents of this 603 area,this stream, Panther Branch, is a very low flow stream. I can't compare it to what Crabtree and stream IN 1625 might be 604 over here but notice the difference with these two third order streams how it is in a shallower basin and this would have been the 605 Seven Mile Creek reservoir. If these up here were excluded from your determination,you could probably still put that reservoir 606 there if you wanted to because those two new bubbles would not affect where that goes but if you exclude these two third order 607 streams,you would be losing that protection of that Seven Mile Creek.