Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 10:19:00 AM
Creation date
5/28/2010 12:52:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/1/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-01-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
ORD-2010-048 Upper Eno Watershed Critical Area - Zoning Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-047a Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan amending boundaries of the watershed critical area overlay districts
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
116 <br />4 <br />If adopted, the proposed amendments.will: <br />• Continue Orange County's long history of water resource and environmental protection, <br />especially in the Upper Eno and Seven Mile Creek confluence natural areas. Portions of <br />the Seven Mile Creek and Upper Eno areas have been designated significant natural <br />heritage areas and the County currently owns more than 300 acres in these areas for the <br />purpose of permanently 'protecting the lands through open space. Planning staff has <br />worked .with staff of ERCD on these proposed amendments. <br />• Release some lands identified for growth and economic development in the Efland area <br />from "Critical Area" designation. <br />• Accurately reflect the fact that potential reservoir sites were designated for protection in <br />1994 while the Town of Hillsborough was deciding where to site its needed reservoir. <br />The Town's reservoir has since been constructed and the Town has no plans to site an <br />additional reservoir. <br />Attachment 8 contains a chart showing the basic zoning regulation differences between the <br />"Protected" and "Critical Area" designations. The most salient differences between the two <br />designations are maximum density and impervious surface limits. <br />Zonina Officer Analysis <br />As required under Section 20.3.3 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Officer is <br />required to: 'cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based upon that analysis, <br />prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning Board and the Board of County <br />Commissioners'. In analyzing this proposal, the following. information is offered: <br />1. Staff was authorized by the BOCC at the October 13, 2009 work session to initiate the <br />proposed amendments in order to further implement the adopted Efland- Mebane Small <br />Area Plan. <br />2. The request for the amendments has been deemed complete in accordance with the <br />requirements of Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />3. The proposed language will bring the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan Text <br />up-to-date in regards to current reservoir plans in the Upper Eno watershed. Additionally, <br />the proposed language will provide protection to sensitive water resources that flow into <br />water supply reservoirs. <br />4. Applying the proposed language to the Watershed Protection Overlay District will result in <br />an up -to -date Zoning Atlas and Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map upon which <br />citizens can rely because of technical and descriptive language. <br />5. The amendments correct inconsistencies between the Zoning Ordinance text and Zoning <br />Atlas (map). <br />Notification Procedural Requirements <br />In accordance with Articles 2 and 20 of the Zoning Ordinance, the public hearing for this item <br />was advertised consistent with the requirements of the Ordinance. Legal ads were placed in <br />two newspapers of general circulation in the County for two (2) successive weeks; notices were <br />mailed to affected property owners and property owners within 500 -feet of affected properties; <br />and a total of 40 signs were posted in strategic areas of the affected areas, in accordance with <br />State statutes. Attachment 5 includes the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.