Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-01-2010 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 10:19:00 AM
Creation date
5/28/2010 12:52:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/1/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-01-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
ORD-2010-048 Upper Eno Watershed Critical Area - Zoning Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-047a Resolution Amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan amending boundaries of the watershed critical area overlay districts
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
115 <br />Comprehensive Plan Consistency <br />A Text Amendment to Chapter 5. land Use Element of the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive <br />Plan is also being proposed to revise existing Conservation Land Use Categories and add additional <br />Categodes/Definitions to be consistent with the changes proposed for water supply watersheds, <br />reservoirs, and critical area in the Zoning Ordinance. Attachment 2 contains the proposed changes <br />to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. <br />Attachment 7 contains several supporting Objectives of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. <br />Rationale For Amendments <br />Rationale for the proposed amendments include: <br />• Matching the Zoning Ordinance text with the Zoning Atlas (map).. The present Zoning <br />Atlas does not match the text language, which can lead to disputes. <br />• Clarifying and adding definitions pertaining to watersheds, critical area, and water supply <br />reservoirs. <br />• Using best available technology to map clearly written descriptions of Watershed Critical <br />Areas. <br />• Correcting general typographical errors in Section 4.2.27. <br />• Revising the Watershed Protection Overlay Districts pertaining to "Critical Area." <br />• Protecting headwaters of fragile water supply and groundwater resources. <br />• Improving water quality for consumption and endangered aquatic species. <br />• Ensuring the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance contain similar provisions <br />in regards to Watershed Protection Overlay Districts with this concurrent amendment. <br />Effects of New Criteria <br />The proposed revised criteria in Section 4.2.27 of the Zoning Ordinance will change existing <br />boundaries of Critical Areas in the Upper Eno watershed. If the amendments are adopted, some <br />properties (2,274 acres) will be removed from "Protected" designation and placed into "Critical Area" <br />designation. Other areas (1,154 acres) will be removed from "Critical Area" and placed in the <br />"Protected" designation. It should be noted that in the Upper Eno watershed, all properties are <br />classified as either "Protected" or "Critical Area" under the Watershed. Protection Overlay District <br />regulations. <br />Adoption of these amendments will result in an increase of designated Critical Areas in the <br />Upper Eno watershed of approximately 8% (13,230 acres in 1994 boundary; 14,350 acres in <br />2010 boundary, an increase of 1,120 acres). The entire Upper Eno watershed is comprised of <br />approximately 38,500 acres. <br />The protection criteria proposed by staff in Section 4.2.27 is expected to result in the following <br />positive environmental impacts: <br />• Reduced sediment <br />• Slowed eutrophication by reduction of nutrients such as Nitrogen and Phosphorus <br />Larger streams (third order and higher) have been suggested for protection within certain <br />distances from Class I reservoirs because these streams have a: <br />• Greater capacity to transport pollutants <br />• Greater capacity in the event of a spill to rapidly affect a down stream water supply <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.