Browse
Search
Minutes - 19830920
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Minutes - 19830920
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 4:29:58 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/20/1983
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-20-1983
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i7 i7 cv <br /> 2 <br /> Personnel Department and the County Manager and offered supplemental material <br /> to members of the Board for clarification of the statistics pertaining to the <br /> percent of total employees who are female -- a statistic that is relevant. <br /> Ken Thompson, County Manager noted that the earlier report identified the <br /> proportion of each protective class employed in the County. <br /> Commissioner Lloyd voiced some concern for dealing with the handicapped as <br /> a protective class in the area of affirmative action. He noted that once <br /> particular goals or quotas are met and that point is surpassed, then you get <br /> into reverse discrimination. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to put the <br /> recommendatons of the Manager and the Commission for Women on the next agenda <br /> under the decisions categoric. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. <br /> D. Board Decisions <br /> D-1 (for public comment and decision) (see <br /> page <br /> for this ordinance) <br /> Mr. Doug Champion spoke on behalf of the Animal Protection Society of <br /> Orange County, responding to the comments made at the meeting in Hillsborough <br /> as requested -- a formal response was prepared and made available to the Board <br /> for review. Additionally, Mr. Champion offered to try to put into perspective <br /> the needs for the ordinance and the essential amendment changes. <br /> Mr. Champion stated and elaborated on three essential protections that are <br /> needed: (1) protection of animals against mistreatment, abandonment, against <br /> unauthorized haboring, and hit and run injury; (2) protection of responsible <br /> owners and keepers, such as the right to have dogs for protection and the right <br /> to reclaim animals; (3) protection of others (meaning other persons, other <br /> animals, other property, and the public at large) by limiting nuisances. Most <br /> of these are listed under offenses, with the exception of female dogs in heat. <br /> It is proposed that those portions of the Ordinance relating to public <br /> health and safety be rewritten to provide a process for citizen complaints, <br /> animal control ordinance citation, impoundment or confinement of dangerous <br /> animals off the premises. <br /> Harvey Carnes stated that he has been a resident of the unincorporated <br /> portion of Orange County for twenty years, and would like to have the <br /> assistance of the Board to keep other dogs off his property - day and night. <br /> He supports the Ordinance. <br /> Dwayne Dryer stated that many refer to the problem of whining and barking <br /> dogs as a nuisance:- when one loses sleep night after night, then it is no <br /> longer a nuisance, but a health endangered situation. <br /> Jean Simmons (a Veterinarian) stated concern for her goats' safety: she <br /> does not want to shoot someone else's dog, but she will if the Ordinance is not <br /> adopted. <br /> Doug McKay spoke in favor of the proposed Ordinance and the changes <br /> recommended by the Animal Protection Society and noted incidents involving his <br /> family and dogs. <br /> Alvin Kennedy noted the need for evening emergency calls for the Animal <br /> Protection Society as well as his concern for the number of dogs that are hit <br /> on city streets and roads. <br /> Hugh Wilson noted that people in the County use dogs for companionship and <br /> protection and is particularly concerned that the Board consider that a civil <br /> and/or legal action of applying to the Magistrate is one remedy for dealing <br /> with dog nuisances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.