Browse
Search
ORD-2007-070 - Conservation Easements Capital Project Ordinance
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2007
>
ORD-2007-070 - Conservation Easements Capital Project Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2011 2:41:33 PM
Creation date
5/27/2010 3:37:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
4gg
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-26-2007-4gg
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2007\Agenda - 06-26-2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to page 32 and asked about the revisions for the <br />West Ten Soccer Complex. Donna Coffey said that she emailed these to the County <br />Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that there are three different projects related to this question <br />about transfers of Homestead Aquatic Center budget to other items. She said that there were <br />two other items that should have an asterisk to flag those items, and these are on page 39 and <br />page 42. She said that Chapel Hill did not need aquatic center funding as soon as thought, so <br />it was assigned to other projects in the tune of a little over $3 million. The problem is when this <br />money comes back. She thinks that all of the projects that have the assignment "Transfer from <br />Homestead Aquatics Center Project" should be transferred back. She said that it is extremely <br />confusing. <br />Also, on page 39, the Northern Park project, and page 42, Greenway Development <br />Reserve, there are transfers. She suggested putting asterisks to flag the items or transferring <br />the money back. <br />Donna Coffey said that these are transfers from a previously approved project. She <br />suggested putting asterisks that these are from 2001 bond funds. She said that she could work <br />with Commissioner Gordon this summer to clarify these issues. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />5. Public Hearings <br />a. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Rural Operating Assistance <br />The Board conducted a public hearing for the NCDOT Rural Operating Assistance <br />Program (ROAP) and considered approving the annual FY 2007-2008 ROAP grant application <br />including supplemental request and authorizing the Chair to sign. <br />Jerry Passmore made a PowerPoint presentation. <br />Public Hearing- June 26, 2007 <br />Rural Operating Assistance Program Application for FY2007-08 <br />ROAP <br />Important Features <br />1.NC Dept. of Transportation designates annually ROAP funds to the lead county transit <br />agency. <br />2.In Orange County the funds are designated to the Orange County Public Transportation <br />(OPT), a division of the Dept. on Aging. <br />3.ROAP application combines three local transit funds: <br />Elderly & Disabled Trans. Assistance Program (EDTAP) <br />Work First Transitional/Employment Trans. Assistance <br />Rural General Public Assistance (GRP) <br />4. ROAP requires no local match. Rural General <br />ROAP <br />Program Description <br />Orange Co- provides for all Medical and one personal shopping/business round trip per <br />week with no access to public routes. Co-pay $3.00 per trip. <br />2.Employment Transportation Assist low income persons (200% of Poverty) & not Work First <br />eligible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.