Browse
Search
Minutes - 19830822
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Minutes - 19830822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 4:18:07 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:38:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/22/1983
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-22-1983
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sic <br /> - 6 <br /> There were no comments. <br /> C. REPORT[ ater TAs__ZPzae <br /> Chairman Whitted noted that packages had been .made available to the <br /> audience and any comments would be appreciated in an effort to prepare a <br /> statement for Secretary Grimsley. He noted the package included a statement <br /> presented to him at the Environmental Management Public Hearing, stating that <br /> the NRCD proposal to upgrade the Falls, Jordan and Neuse Lakes is supported by <br /> the Triangle J Council of Governments (COG) . This statement represents the <br /> position of the Water Resources Advisory Committee of the Council of the <br /> Governments, and was also approved by the Executive Committee. He noted that <br /> this is considered a water goal and not an endorsement of the present condition <br /> of the lakes. Support is also noted for the designation of both watersheds as <br /> nutrient sensitive. Another concern is emphasis on the drinking water quality <br /> rather than for the existing algae and nutrients. <br /> Chairman Whitted noted that it was asked that the Environmental Management <br /> Commission create a new enhanced protection designation to adequately address <br /> the existing problems, such as inorganic substances and traces of metal. <br /> The Chairman noted the second document, entitled 'Possible Falls/Jordan <br /> Management Strategy' is a working document used by the Water Resources Advisory <br /> Committee at its August 17, 1983 meeting. He noted two sections Urban Runoff <br /> -Existing Areas and Urban Runoff-New Development were areas where Orange could <br /> be most effective in both watersheds. He stated that proposed management <br /> strategies have been presented to the Water Resources Advisory Committee and <br /> COG, but none have been voted on by the Committee or COG. (See attachment.) <br /> Other areas of discussion were the Wastewater Treatment, Hazardous Material <br /> Spills, and Equity Sharing. He noted that as the Board of Commissioners look <br /> at the development of the two watersheds, there should be some consistency from <br /> one jurisdiction to the other, and this should be one of the concerns addressed <br /> in the community with Secretary Grimsley. <br /> Commissioner Whitted also noted the proposed water quality goals of the <br /> Falls Watershed Management for nutrients, sedimentation and stormwater runoff <br /> and the pie charts which demonstrated the various watersheds and the inputs of <br /> surrounding counties. <br /> Commissioner Whitted noted that the City of Durham's response to Secretary <br /> Grimseey will primarily encourage a City and County Sedimentation and Erosion <br /> Control Ordinance. The City of Cary has endorsed the statement made by <br /> Commisssioner Whitted for the Triangle J Council of Governments. <br /> Commissioner Whitted noted that in the statement to Secretary Grimsley, the <br /> County should emphasize the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance. He <br /> noted that the statement should also indicate the County's willingness to work <br /> with the Soil and Water Conservation District in an effort to develop the best <br /> management plans for agricultural use, indicating a need for more manpower in <br /> this effort. There should be a user fee applied for recreational and drinking <br /> water use, thus creating a pool to assist farmers in the local store for <br /> payment of management plans. He also noted a need to get some input from the <br /> NRCD Staff in an effort to determine how the County is going to reduce <br /> phosphorous. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit noted that because Orange County is less developed <br /> than other counties, there is a higher agricultural contribution, especially as <br /> this relates to Durham and Wake Counties. He noted that because Durham and <br /> Wake Counties utilize a larger portion of the watershed than Orange County, <br /> this should be a primary consideration as limitations are addressed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.