Browse
Search
Minutes - 19830627
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Minutes - 19830627
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 8:11:13 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/27/1983
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-27-1983
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
464 <br /> districts. It applies in the latter situations because of the high-density <br /> nature of such projects and sets standards for open space, recreation, <br /> liveability, and building spacir-g. Preliminary indications are that the <br /> requested rezoning and subsequent application of the LUI system will require <br /> the developer to provide 1.2 acres of recreation area within the project. <br /> Finally, the property in question is adjacent to an area known as the <br /> Harmon-Young Activity Node. The Node is currently under study by the Planning <br /> Staff. <br /> John i.cAda,;.s, consulting engineer representing the developer, race a <br /> presentation on the overall development of the lot and reviewed the water and <br /> sewer service to the area from the Town of Hillsborough's system. <br /> Commissioner T°7illhoit asked if a pump station was required. IicAcai, <br /> responded that two pump stations were involved, one on site, and one north of <br /> the site with a force main required to connect onto the existing Hillsborough <br /> system. He also states: that the expected construction completion crate is <br /> mid-July. <br /> Commissioner Tlillhoit noted that the County helped to purchase the e--sting <br /> line on US 707• partly as justification for attracting future industry. He also <br /> asked if the buffer was missing along NC 86. Nr. -McAdams stated that he %;as <br /> observing Wi?dwood Phase I. Commissioner Tlillhcit asked if a better buffer was <br /> planned for Phase 11. 14c Adams noted that he comtemplated the use of a similar <br /> buffer. <br /> Commissioner Tiillboit inquired about access to NC 86. NcMams stated that <br /> access would be through Wildwood Phases I and II, and no lots would access <br /> directly on NC 86. <br /> Kr. Collins noted that recreational facilities are required in R-5 zoning <br /> areas. <br /> Planning Board I•Iember Pilkey asked how many taxpayers would indirectly fund <br /> the project, but not benefit from the water and sewer lines. I•ir. el lams <br /> responded that the Town would recognize sewer revenues far in excess to address <br /> "fairness" issues. He noted the Town of Hillsborough was supplying the labor <br /> and the developer the materials as part of the negotiated agreement. He also <br /> stated that the Town wanted a line sized far in excess of that needed to serve <br /> the development and wanted to avoid a payback agreement to the developer by <br /> sharing the costs up front. He noted there was a 12 inch water line which <br /> would enable the Town to create a loop system with Joppa Oaks. <br /> Planning Boars: Chair Irvin expressed concern with the high density proposed <br /> and asked what preparations were being made for stormwater management. I-icldams <br /> responded these measures had not yet been designed. <br /> Dr. Irvin inquired what land buffer would be established to protect the <br /> residential development from fu-ture industrial development. Dir. McAdams <br /> responded that the developer was uncertain if the industrial development would <br /> be proposed as the Land Use Plan does not yet designate such uses in the area <br /> and his client did not have strong feelings about it. He added that any buffer <br /> would include setbacks, vegetation and visual screening, but noted it is a site <br /> design not a rezoning consideration. Irvin noted that he did not feel a <br /> railroad is a good buffer. <br /> Planning Board -:ember Pilkey asked if the houses in the R--5 rezoning would <br /> contain the sane footage as those in Wildwood Phase I and inquired if a. road <br /> through the R-8 section would connect NC 86 and Old NC 86 making two access <br /> roads onto ?IC 86. IicAdams responded that the houses would be 950 s(yua.re feet <br /> and that a connecting roar: was not under his client's control. He added that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.