Browse
Search
Minutes - 19830627
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Minutes - 19830627
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 8:11:13 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/27/1983
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-27-1983
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46� <br /> 2 <br /> Commissioner Whitted responded that the evidence could not be accepted <br /> after the close of the public hearing. <br /> Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill indicated the Board could impose a condition <br /> that the required easements be obtained. <br /> Mr. Northen stated that the applicant would try to obtain the easement, <br /> but, if unobtainable, desired the request to delete the condition regareins <br /> fire access to be considered. <br /> Planning Board t•lember Pilkey inquired about the width of the right-of-way <br /> and if the travelway of the alternate fire access through rieadowcrest is paved. <br /> Planning Department Staff responded 60 feet and unpaved. <br /> Pilkey inquired what property owners would be involved. Northen <br /> questioned the accuracy of displayed access map, but responded the developer of <br /> the large lot subdivision. Fe added the fire access spur would split a lot an(i <br /> that the developer - Just Us :Iortage Company, had retained ownership of the <br /> lots. The Planning Staff indicated the airport site extended beyond that shown <br /> on the display. <br /> Planning Board 'ember I.izer asked the attorney if he was prepared to <br /> provide information on the square footage of the uses. Attorney Northen <br /> responded at issue was what the accessory Uses included in the development. <br /> Kizer questioned the impact of accessory uses and indicated the Planning Board <br /> did not have copies of the hangar accessory -uses diagram to speak, to. He asked <br /> the size of the proposed hangars. Susan. Smith of the Planning Staff indicated <br /> the approximate size of the har_gar is 16,000 square feet. I:izer asked how vany <br /> hangars would be located on the site. Northen responded three (3) hangars. <br /> Kizer inquired if the second floor would contain similar uses. Northen answered <br /> possibly, but that the issue was the type of uses, not their location. I,iser <br /> asked if a branch banking facility was included. Northen responded if the <br /> Board of Commissioners considered it an accessory use. He felt the accessory <br /> use issue was critical as there is a big difference between a use incidental to <br /> an airport and a large use not usually associated with a small airport. <br /> There were no audience con-aaents. <br /> Commissioner vThitted asked if the Board wished to adjourn the public <br /> hearing until August 1, 1583, to receive the Planning Board recommendation. <br /> Commissioner I•iarshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to adjourn <br /> the public hearing. The vote was unanimous. <br /> The Board continued the regular meeting. Following a break at 8:40, and <br /> the arrival of Carl Walters, the necessary Planning Board member to make a <br /> quorum, the Board reconvened the joint Public Hearing to discuss Agenda Item D <br /> Rezoning - James Rae Freeland. <br /> D. R�ninS�n�� Fs���ad <br /> Ilarvin Collins, Planning Director, made the following presentation: kr. <br /> James Rae Freeland is requesting that the zoning be changed on 35.11 acres of <br /> property located south of I-85 on the west side of N.C. Highway 86. The <br /> property is shown as a portion of lot 4 on Tax Map 45-Hillsborough Township. <br /> He noted the zoning is Rural Residential (R-1) which would allow one (1) <br /> residential dwelling unit per acre. <br /> The requested zoning is High Intensity Residential (R-5) which would <br /> allow up to five (5) dwelling units per acre with a minimum lot size <br /> reruirement of 7,500 square feet. Development of the tract at such densities <br /> could result in as many as 163 lots. <br /> Property to the north is zoned R-1 Residential and contains scattered <br /> single-family homes. To the south is a 10-acre tract zoned R-4 Residential and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.