Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> addressed and expressed concern with the impact on the value of the adjacent <br /> lands. <br /> Roger Smith asked if the Horace Williams problem justifies removal of the <br /> conditions placed on the Midway Airport Special Use Permit and answered his own <br /> question with a negative response. <br /> John Northen, Attorney, indicated that the developer would provide <br /> information on the proposed accessory uses and the possible fire access through <br /> Meadowcrest. <br /> Commissioner Whitted indicated that the additional information and evidence <br /> would be received at a continuation of the public hearing at a later date. <br /> Pat Crawford, Bingham Township resident, asked if the additional evidence <br /> would be available for public comment. <br /> Commissioner Fitted answered affirmatively and indicated that the <br /> continuation of the public hearing would be on June 27, 1983. <br /> Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted to approve <br /> continuation of the public hearing to June 27, 1983. <br /> . D-2 Pr-QFcsed Private Road-Standards <br /> Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages of this book) <br /> There were no citizen comments. <br /> D-3 }division Reg)alaions <br /> Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages of this book) <br /> There were no citizen comments. <br /> D-4 Pror►osed Text <br /> Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages of this book) <br /> Planning Board Member Kizer asked if this allowed the possibility of a <br /> modification to the Special Use Permit without being subject to a public <br /> hearing if passed. Member Kizer felt that the hearing should be continued to <br /> obtain public input on these changes. <br /> There were no citizen comments. <br /> E-1 BOARL_n I,gTONS - Fas us�_PrQ�servat (zn__.A .cram <br /> Logan Irvin, Planning Board Chair, indicated that the Planning Board <br /> endorsed the program. He added that the sentence regarding I-40 should be <br /> deleted in #4 of the findings of fact. <br /> Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to contract <br /> for legislative drafting of the program into a form for legislative submittal. <br /> VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) . <br /> Commissioner Lloyd indicated that he had two areas of concern with the <br /> program: the. required sign-up for a ten or a twenty year conservation <br /> agreement and the requirement regarding application of SCS approved erosion <br /> control practices on critical areas. He noted that he would oppose a program <br /> containing these items. <br /> E-Z Watershed Prpi-pgtio <br /> Rick Cannity gave the presention on the implementation of watershed <br /> protection measures. <br /> Irvin Logan requested that the Board reconsider the minimum lot sizes and <br /> direct the Planning Board appropriately as the Planning Board felt that this <br /> issue was critical to their consideration of industrial development. He noted <br /> that there was quite a variation in opinion on minimum lot size in water supply <br /> watersheds among Planning Board Members. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit indicated that there was considerable misinformation <br /> regarding the application of minimum lot sizes in the County, noting that many <br /> erroneously thought or were led to believe that the minimum lot sizes would be <br /> applicable countywide, and not just in the designated watersheds. He noted <br />