Orange County NC Website
1. <br /> 2. <br /> 3. items prior to discussion of the caging requirements. <br /> 4• 6. EMS FRANCHISE CERTIFICATE <br /> 5• Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to: <br /> 6• 1) Issue franchises and certificates to South Orange and <br /> Orange County Rescue Squads for the authorization to <br /> 7• administer emergency medical care and transport patients; <br /> 8. 2) Issue franchises to Southeastern MedEvac, Piedmont <br /> Ambulance Service and Southern Triangle Ambulance <br /> 9• Service to allow for transport of non-emergency patients; <br /> 10. and, <br /> 3) Issue certificates to Caldwell and Chapel Hill first <br /> 11• responders 'to provide for administering emergency patient <br /> care. <br /> 12. <br /> 13. Vote: ayes, 5; noes, 0. <br /> This will return to the agenda of May 2nd for second adoption. <br /> 15. 5. CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCXMENT TENTATIVE BUDGET <br /> 16, Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , <br /> 17•approval of the tentative budget as presented by the Child Support <br /> 18. Enforcement Officer, Janet Sparks. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. <br /> 190 The Board asked that a letter accompany this budget which clarifies <br /> 2o.that this is a tentative budget only and that a final budget will be <br /> 21.constructed during the budget process and final budget ordinance approval <br /> 22*in June. <br /> 8. PROCLAMATION HEALTH WEEK <br /> 23. <br /> Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd, to <br /> 2'4. <br /> 25,proclaim April 17-23, 1983, Health Week in Orange County. Ms. Evelyn <br /> 26.Lloyd, Board of Health Chair, thanked the Board of Commissioners for <br /> 27.this recognition of Health Services. <br /> 28. The Board resumed discussion of the Caging Requirements for <br /> 299 Wild Animals. <br /> 30• Mr. Mahler asked if there was a mechanism for extension of caging <br /> requirements. Commissioner Whitted replied that the Board could amend <br /> 31. <br /> 32,the Ordinance if necessary. <br /> -...-33.9_. . Or. Modrich, owner of a serval , contested the caging requirements <br /> 34•for servals, saying they were more restrictive than those for tigers. <br /> He asked that the electriffed fence and interior/exterior poles be <br /> 35. <br /> 36.deleted as requirements for serval cages. <br /> Ms. Lorie Stephenson, Orange County citizen, announced that during <br /> 37. <br /> her visit last week to the State Legislature, she had learned that the <br /> 38. <br /> 39. <br /> 40. <br />