Orange County NC Website
1. <br /> 2. <br /> 3• the report does a good. job of translating water quality variables into zoning <br /> 4• ordinance concepts but that there are two contradictions with the County's Water <br /> 5• Resources Task Force's adopted recommendations: 1) the clustering concept presumes <br /> 6. extension of sewer lines into the watershed. The County has adopted a policy of <br /> 70 extension into the watersheds only under emergency conditions. 2) The Carrboro <br /> 8. proposal would provide for industrial development in the watershed. The County's <br /> 9. policy is to prohibit industrial development in University Lake and Cane Creek <br /> 10. watersheds. Commissioner Willhoit continued his motion saying, that the joint <br /> 110 planning process could be used to identify areas outside Carrboro's watershed for <br /> 12* industrial development and to encoura a Carrboro's <br /> 9 participation in joint planning. <br /> 11. Aldermen TIbite .said Combo= feels that industrial develcpment carefu- lly <br /> 12. planned could occur within the watershed without harming water Quality. Alder- <br /> 13. man Ruite told the Board that even if the County helped identify areas for <br /> 14. Caaxboro's industrial development outside the watershed he would still favor <br /> 15. such development within the watershed. <br /> 16. Commissioner Lloyd said he agreed with Alderman Tbite: that economic <br /> 17. development can occur within watersheds with protection.; and extension of water <br /> 18. and sewer Lines into the watersheds where ever necessary. <br /> 190 Commissioner Willhoit said that extension of water and sewer lines encouraged <br /> 20, hidxx density development than might otherwise occur; the non-point source <br /> 21. nmoff is related to the intensity of development and impermeable surfaces, <br /> 22. "which go hand in hand." Commissioner Lloyd disagreed '�dth that concept." . <br /> 23. Vote: -Ayes, 3 (Commissioners Marshall, whitted and NX17hoit); noes, 2 <br /> 24. (CamAssioners Lloyd and Walker) <br /> 25. 6. Ecanrxnic bevel t Camaission Candidates Questions: The Board <br /> 26. approved, by consensus, the questions submitted by the Manager. The Board <br /> 27. further agreed by cansensus to intezview four candidates each on April 5th <br /> 28. and April 19th. <br /> 29, 7. Board of Equalization and Review: Commissioner Willhoit nominated <br /> 30. T= HSffn=; Commissioner Lloyd nominated Tyson Clayton and Commissioner <br /> 31. ..Marshall.nominated Elizabeth-.Walters._to the.-Board of Equalization. and Review. <br /> 32. Cam ssiaier Walker moved, second by Commissioner Tkdtted, to close the nominations <br /> 33. and to appoint those three members. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. <br /> 34. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seceded. by Commissioner Marshall, to appoint <br /> 35. Mr. Heffner Chair of that Board. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. <br /> 36, Commissioner Willhoit moved, secandedby Commissioner Tkdtted, to set the <br /> 37. Per diem at $50.00 . <br /> 38. <br />