Orange County NC Website
Levengood 8 <br />4) TIF could be used to create an industrial corridor centered around nodes of <br />density: <br />As Orange County has expressed interest in using TIF to develop its EDDs, these sites <br />have the potential to be part of a more comprehensive strategy. The county, for <br />example, could promote the districts as three nodes of density along 1 -85 that could <br />connect the Piedmont Triad and Alamance County to the west with Durham to the <br />east, forming an industrial corridor. If density is promoted in these areas, then other <br />developers, without TIF incentives, might take advantage of cheap rents and <br />established infrastructure to develop along the corridor and eventually connect the <br />EDDs. <br />5) The countyshouldstriveformunicipa ]involvement: <br />Though an Orange County - administered TIF would be located on unincorporated <br />land, there is opportunity for city /county cooperation. Ideal development would <br />create linkages; for example, while a firm might locate its manufacturing operations <br />in an unincorporated TIF, it could locate another aspect of its operations in Chapel <br />Hill or Hillsborough. This approach would exploit location advantages both <br />specifically, in terms of where within in the county each firm or operation would <br />locate, and also broadly, in that the county could use its amenities, including those in <br />its cities, to attract outside business. <br />V. Additional Strategies <br />While TIF is one strategy Orange County should consider pursuing to grow its tax <br />base and promote economic development, a number of other development finance <br />mechanisms have been employed by North Carolina jurisdictions. The following <br />chart introduces each strategy, with a summary of pros and cons. The first four are <br />more traditional mechanisms, whereas the final three are newer to the economic <br />development "toolkit" and have, with a few exceptions, been relatively untested in <br />the state (See Appendix). <br />VI. Conclusion <br />As Orange County proceeds with plans to reinvent its economic development policy, <br />the EDAB should consider TIF, as well as other financing tools. A number of <br />characteristics of the county make TIF implementation both problematic and <br />advantageous, and the case studies in this report have sought to uncover this <br />dichotomy while providing examples of positive and negative outcomes. By <br />recognizing caveats and pursuing ideal development, Orange County has the <br />unprecedented ability to craft TIP policy that, if part of a comprehensive and <br />innovative plan, could steer a nationwide phenomenon, the "greenfield TIF", toward <br />a more equitable and sustainable future. <br />