Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 9:08:50 AM
Creation date
5/14/2010 4:02:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8b
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-18-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Levengood 8 <br />4) TIF could be used to create an industrial corridor centered around nodes of <br />density: <br />As Orange County has expressed interest in using TIF to develop its EDDs, these sites <br />have the potential to be part of a more comprehensive strategy. The county, for <br />example, could promote the districts as three nodes of density along 1 -85 that could <br />connect the Piedmont Triad and Alamance County to the west with Durham to the <br />east, forming an industrial corridor. If density is promoted in these areas, then other <br />developers, without TIF incentives, might take advantage of cheap rents and <br />established infrastructure to develop along the corridor and eventually connect the <br />EDDs. <br />5) The countyshouldstriveformunicipa ]involvement: <br />Though an Orange County - administered TIF would be located on unincorporated <br />land, there is opportunity for city /county cooperation. Ideal development would <br />create linkages; for example, while a firm might locate its manufacturing operations <br />in an unincorporated TIF, it could locate another aspect of its operations in Chapel <br />Hill or Hillsborough. This approach would exploit location advantages both <br />specifically, in terms of where within in the county each firm or operation would <br />locate, and also broadly, in that the county could use its amenities, including those in <br />its cities, to attract outside business. <br />V. Additional Strategies <br />While TIF is one strategy Orange County should consider pursuing to grow its tax <br />base and promote economic development, a number of other development finance <br />mechanisms have been employed by North Carolina jurisdictions. The following <br />chart introduces each strategy, with a summary of pros and cons. The first four are <br />more traditional mechanisms, whereas the final three are newer to the economic <br />development "toolkit" and have, with a few exceptions, been relatively untested in <br />the state (See Appendix). <br />VI. Conclusion <br />As Orange County proceeds with plans to reinvent its economic development policy, <br />the EDAB should consider TIF, as well as other financing tools. A number of <br />characteristics of the county make TIF implementation both problematic and <br />advantageous, and the case studies in this report have sought to uncover this <br />dichotomy while providing examples of positive and negative outcomes. By <br />recognizing caveats and pursuing ideal development, Orange County has the <br />unprecedented ability to craft TIP policy that, if part of a comprehensive and <br />innovative plan, could steer a nationwide phenomenon, the "greenfield TIF", toward <br />a more equitable and sustainable future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.