Orange County NC Website
Levengood 7 <br />For one, the question of "but for' would be easily arguable. Although part of a major <br />metropolitan area, Orange County has not experienced typical suburban growth <br />because of restrictive land use policy and high taxes; therefore, as private investment <br />has routinely chosen neighboring jurisdictions, Orange County could argue that "but <br />for" a TIF district, development will not locate in the area. Additionally, as the county <br />is part of a highly productive region, demand for goods and services is present, and <br />the supportive institutions throughout the Research Triangle assure that a Roanoke <br />Rapids -style outcome is unlikely. <br />Finally, given the county's perceived "anti- growth" culture, TIF designation would be <br />advantageous because it does not require voter referendum and could be an <br />apolitical process. On the other hand, bypassing the process of civic engagement <br />could lead to TIF abuse, and if the districts promote urban sprawl, a political <br />backlash, similar to what occurred in New Mexico, might result. <br />Nevertheless, when used aside a comprehensive and innovative economic <br />development strategy, TIF remains a viable option for Orange County, as long as the <br />following recommendations are considered: <br />1) Orange County must identify developer interest and have a specific project /plan <br />in mind: <br />TIFs in North Carolina require a private component. Orange County could not merely <br />use the financing mechanism to develop infrastructure in its EDDs and then hope <br />that developers then express interest Q. Morgan, personal communication, December <br />4, 2009). Having a private developer or specific firm signed on to the project as well <br />as a concrete plan makes the TIF legally viable and increases the likelihood of <br />success. <br />2) Development must not contribute to urban sprawl: <br />Malls, strip shopping centers, and traditional single- family subdivisions should be <br />avoided. To address this concern, North Carolina's enabling legislation has already <br />set forth the requirement that "within a TIF district itself that is located outside a <br />city's central business district, no more than 20% of the square footage maybe given <br />over to commercial uses other than office space" (Blocher 6). <br />3) New Urban developmen t should be considered as a potential TIF use: <br />New Urban communities have been popular and successful in Orange County and <br />could be financed through TIP. As they include both residential and commercial <br />components, a New Urban development would contribute broadly to the county's tax <br />base in a manner compatible with established community values. <br />