Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 9:08:50 AM
Creation date
5/14/2010 4:02:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8b
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-18-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Prospective companies need to know what to expect between the time of searching for a site and the <br />start of operations. This can be accomplished by establishing a clear process for company evaluation and <br />compliance review. Moreover, standard formulas for determining incentives, such as the net present <br />value formula used by Austin, achieve a means for determining the inducements that Orange County can <br />offer to prospective companies. <br />Author's Note: <br />Over the course of the semester 1 have heard qualitative comparisons between the Triangle region and <br />Austin. As I had the chance to travel to Austin in October for personal reasons, I took the opportunity to <br />reserve interviews with personnel from the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce, visit the campus of UT <br />Austin, and visit the Austin Technology Incubator. <br />However, the research is tailored a bit to match the requests of the Advisory Board. It is my <br />understanding that during the County Commissioner's November retreat, a request was made to <br />investigate the "incentive" process used by Austin. This introduces the point of departure in that this <br />documentation of a case study is not a discussion of the commercialization process of UT Austin and the <br />City's subsequent retention practices. Indeed, Austin has made a significant effort in retaining companies <br />spun-off from the university. Instead, the narrative below investigates Austin's response to later -stage <br />firms. <br />I also understand arguments for not comparing these two regions. For example, the Triangle is known as <br />a hub for biotechnology while Austin is known for software and information technology. However, Austin <br />has made a concerted effort in recent years to attract biotechnology firms, although their "major missing <br />ingredient" is a medical campus such as the campus at UNC- Chapel Hill. Also, Austin does not have an <br />adjacent entity which attracts businesses away from the city, such as what Raleigh and RTP are to <br />Orange County. Austin is the home of state government, a university campus, and established industries. <br />It is the central hub of a 5-county regional partnership. And finally, the powers given to a city government <br />in Texas may not be similar to the powers given to a county government in North Carolina. <br />These shortcomings aside, the research intends to present the structured incentive process employed in <br />Austin. The Commissioners of Orange County can benefit from understanding how the process has <br />evolved in recent years to address issues of social equity and public disclosure. Final recommendations <br />will be made to add to an understanding of how government can proactively address companies with <br />interest in locating in Orange County. <br />981Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.