Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 9:00:33 AM
Creation date
5/14/2010 3:57:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-18-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />documents. Several agencies had described what they had, but not the quantity or the space <br />needed to store these items. (Scope Document, Attachment A) <br />Interviews and Survey: <br />To begin this project, I constructed a survey of eight questions and met individually with, <br />members of the work group that represented historical agencies. (Survey Document, <br />Attachment B) i went to each location so i could physically see the materials and how they <br />were stored. I could then ascertain how much space each required. The questions were <br />constructed to illicit consistent information from each group, while understanding their <br />operations and interest in a Heritage Center. The only group that I didn't meet with was the <br />Chapel Hili Museum as they were busy with other issues and had previously expressed that <br />they would not be interested in sharing their collection for a greater Orange County Heritage <br />archival effort. <br />The questions I asked included: <br />1. What were the problems and advantages to establishing a Heritage Center? <br />2. What documents each would or would not share; <br />3. How should the center be managed; <br />4. What funding would they be willing to contribute; and <br />5. What documents, other than those owned by the historical agencies, should <br />be collected? <br />During the visit I estimated the spatial needs of each institution in the Heritage Center Work <br />Group and updated the Scope Document. <br />I also met with the Library staff and with the Business group of the Heritage Center Work Group <br />and asked similar questions. I was told that Commissioner Jacobs was interested in the project <br />and interested in speaking to me. Commissioner Barry Jacobs met with me and again, <br />answered many of the same questions. To get the opinions of "users" of the facility, I spoke to <br />three individuals who had been present at County Commissioner meetings to get their <br />feedback for the need for this facility. Carol Boggs, Stewart Dunaway and Narissa Williams <br />were in favor of a Heritage Center though understood funding difficulties. <br />After meeting with all the partners I compiled the answers into one document so that I could <br />see what the developing trends were. i deliberately did not attach names or agencies to the <br />comments. I distributed these answers to the group members. (Compiled Survey, <br />Attachment C) <br />The most significant information that came out of the survey, in my opinion, was: <br />1j Only one agency was willing to place their archival materials with a "Heritage Center" if <br />the environment was an improvement over theirs; <br />2] Other agencies would share copies or researched materials; we learned that the Burwell <br />School had received a grant and was already digitizing their collections. They would <br />share a digital copy of their collections; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.