Orange County NC Website
(� General Engineering and Environmental Management Services <br />WRITE STREET LANDFILL <br />tceginnmg in iaa,% nurc <br />worked closely with City staff to <br />develop a state mandated <br />"transition plan" for the White <br />Street Sanitary Landfill. The <br />plan was developed to describe <br />the remaining landfill <br />operations at the current site as <br />an approved disposal facility. <br />Activities included the design and permitting of a major vertical <br />expansion to the existing Phase II fill areas of the site to provide for <br />disposal needs until January 1, 1998, when the transition would be <br />made into a lined Subtitle D cell designated as Phase III. In addition <br />to providing additional capacity, the expansion resulted in a more environmentally acceptable facility by reducing surface <br />water infiltration. The design included a closure /post- closure plan for Phase II in accordance with Subtitle D regulations. <br />HDR has worked with the City of Greensboro since 1994 to permit and construct the Phase If Subtitle D municipal solid <br />waste unit and to optimize the facility capacity at the approximately 800 -acre White Street facility. HDR has been <br />responsible for the development of technical documentation including a site study and construction permit application, as <br />well as plans, specifications, operation plans, and cost estimates for the implementation of the project components. <br />Work also included the preparation of bid documents, bid evaluation, submittal reviews, and construction <br />inspection /quality assurance. In addition, HDR has prepared closure /post- <br />closure plans for the existing facility, permitting for borrow areas, plans for HDR performed rigorous fate and <br />erosion and sedimentation control, and other landfill monitoring services. The transport modeling at the White Street <br />first 25 -acre Subtitle D cell was constructed in 1997 for $6.9 million, prior to the Landfill to gain NCDENR approval of a <br />NCDENR January 1, 1998, deadline. The construction of an additional 14 -acre lower cost, more environmentally <br />cell was completed in January 2001 at a cost of $3.2 million. Following that Protective alternate liner system. <br />P ry 9 HDR provides operational support to <br />project, a 13 -acre cell was completed in November 2004 at a cost of $2 million. the Greensboro Landfill, revievring all <br />HDR prepared the bid documents and provided construction administration and facets of its operation on a quarterly <br />construction quality assurance services for each project. The total 52 -acre basis. The landfill received the first <br />landfill unit has been designed and constructed too operate as a potential "Ce "Certificate s of Exemplary Performance" <br />9 P P Issued by NCDENR. <br />bioreactor. <br />In 2000, HDR submitted an alternative liner demonstration for Phase III, Cells 2 <br />and 3, to allow the use of a geosynthetic clay liner in the base liner preserving <br />the City's limited soil resources. <br />Cent %ffcafe of Even, p'aryPerformoire <br />f <br />In addition, HDR developed and implemented a Landfill Facility Operation Audit <br />process in 2000. The audit, conducted semi - annually, reviews all facets of oY`` "t 5" "� "'0 <br />fvv.aJww:...0 4 ae.pre!ww.F� as <br />landfill operations including record keeping, safety, equipment maintenance,""M �m <br />permit compliance, and operation efficiency. The audits resulted in an <br />exemplary rating by NCDENR. The City of Greensboro was the first landfill to w <br />receive this award from the state. In 2001, HDR prepared a Solid Waste . <br />Management Study Update to a prior study prepared in 1996. The intent of both the original study and the update was <br />to analyze waste management options available to the City to confirm the best long -term strategies. The Update <br />considered resource recovery technologies including mass bum, refuse derived fuel (RDF), gasification, and MSW <br />composting. Additionally, land disposal options were reviewed including expansion of the White Street Landfill; <br />development of a new, in -county landfill; or out -of- county disposal. The findings of the report confirmed that, from an <br />economic standpoint, continued disposal of MSW at White Street was the least cost option. However, due to the long <br />Page 13 q <br />