Browse
Search
Minutes - 19820907
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Minutes - 19820907
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 4:20:53 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/7/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-07-1982
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4y� <br /> Condition # 6: There was a consensus to incorporate the construction. schedule ; <br /> referred to in the July 8, 1982, Minutes as a condition to the Special Use Per- <br /> mit. Mr. Luce, Planning Staff, read the construction schedule: <br /> The airport construction will. be started within one year of the <br /> final approval and all construction will be completed within two <br /> years of its initiation. Phase I will be completed ninety days <br /> after the completion of the runway; Phase II will be started with <br /> in six months after the start of construction of Phase I; Phase <br /> III will be completed within two years of the completion of Phase <br /> II. <br /> /Condition # 5 is the construction schedule;] <br /> Condition # 7: There was much discussion as to whether or'not the runway should <br /> be bonded as 'are public improvements. There was some feeling that without the <br /> runway there was no airport and that such a contingency was covered by the <br /> imposition of condition # 5 specifying the construction schedule. The develop- <br /> er, on the advice of the County Attorney, was asked whether he wodld rather have <br /> a time limit placed on the runway construction or whether he would rather have <br /> to post a bond for the runway construction. <br /> Mr. Hazard: <br /> ...It would be difficult to operate an airport without a runway. <br /> So if you look at it from that standpoint instead of dwelling on <br /> all of the what ifs and everything. If you were building 1-40, what <br /> if you had put a limit on I-40? You know you can't do something <br /> like that...How do I know when its going to rain? Or whether the <br /> equipments going to break down? Or what? So you're asking questions <br /> that are impossible to answer...And you have to assume that if we want <br /> to build an airport that we will build a runway. I..ah, you have to <br /> take that on face value. And we do want the runway in there as soon <br /> as possible; because we can't make any money until there's a runway.... <br /> Oh, we don't want to post a bond for the construction of anything <br /> except what you would require another developer to do. Now if you <br /> make a man do a subdivision and make him post a bond for all the <br /> houses, we'll post a bond for the runway. <br /> There was a consensus among the Board members to place a bond on all <br /> public improvements as outlined in Planning Board recommendation # 7 but <br /> i <br /> to place a one year construction limit on the runway rather than requiring <br /> the developer to post bond for the runway. That is, one year after the pro- <br /> ... I <br /> jest is begun, the runway must be completed. <br /> Mr. Hazard: "One year is fine...If we can't make it in a year, we won't <br /> make it but the one year is fine. I wouldn't feel comfortable and would be <br /> hesitant with anything less than that...." <br /> /Condition # 6 is the posting of the bonds for the public improvements and the <br /> additional time imposition on the runway construction.] <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.