Browse
Search
Minutes - 19820719
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Minutes - 19820719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 3:52:29 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:35:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/19/1982
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 07-19-1982
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
295 <br /> k <br /> ¢ Mr. Matthews: <br /> The typical FAA approved traffic pattern altitude for small air- <br /> ports will bring an airplane in roughly half a mile off the side of <br /> the runway at an altitude, and this can be set by the airport owner; <br /> typically it's 800' above ground level. Some airports have chosen to <br /> raise that altitude to a 1000' to 1200'... Primarily for noise. There <br /> are some airports that have a mix of high performance of jet traffic -- <br /> low performance propeller. They'll put the props low and the jets high <br /> to separate them. <br /> The airplane typically would continue at this point about a half a <br /> mile off the center of the runway. Till it reaches a point roughly one <br /> half to three quarters og a mile beyond the end of the runway at which <br /> point it would make a 90 left turn and begin descending, it would actually <br /> begin descending at a point about adjacen� to the end of the runway. <br /> We would begin a descent, turn another 90 left turn to line up with <br /> the runway, approximately 2500 to 3000' out. At that point the airplane <br /> would be maybe 300' above ground level as it turned its final approach. <br /> The FAA specifies for all airports that a left turn pattern is standard. <br /> Which means essentially that in turning into a runway the airplane is <br /> always making a left turn; in taking off and turning away from the airport <br /> it's always making left turns. The problem with_.is, and HWA has a right <br /> hand pattern, on runway 26, being the approach from the East over NC 86. <br /> HWA has adopted a right hand pattern for runway 26; a left hand pattern <br /> would have aircraft flying down here which of course is a very heavily <br /> developed residential apartment area. So HWA has a right pattern so that <br /> when aircraft are operating back to the West they will make right turns <br /> landing and right turns taking off. This is one of the things we do for <br /> noise abatement. We would possibly raise the traffic pattern altitude; <br /> we might have preferential runways; you might decide, for example, that <br /> there are areas around the airport that are noise sensitive that should <br /> not have traffic over them either at any time or during specific times <br /> during the day in which case we might say between the hours of 8 P.M. and <br /> 7 A.M. land and take off only on a certain runway. <br /> There are several different things we could do to alter that traffic <br /> pattern if necessary. <br /> Ms. Crawford: Asked if there was any reason Mr. Matthews was aware of <br /> that would preclude its /Midway's% using a left hand pattern. <br /> Mr. Matthews: Responded that he didn't know of any now. But that was an <br /> option that was completely up to the owner of the airport to choose to "imple- <br /> ment a right handed pattern or a higher or lower altitude" under FAA standards. <br /> Mr. Irvin: - Referred to the public hearing of duly 8 (on this same request) <br /> and said that some people had said noise was not a problem around airports. He <br /> continued saying that now Mr. Matthews was indicating that it was a problem, citing <br /> "shifting air approach patterns" and acoustical standards for buildings near <br /> C airport zones. <br /> Mr. Matthews: Agreed that noise was a factor for "some operations" and some <br /> airports. He,added that noise, he thought, would have been more of a consideration <br /> 0 in the Midway initial proposal because it would have had "virtually unrestricted. <br /> operations of jet aircraft." Now that won't be a problem, Mr. Matthews, said, <br /> because the owner indicated he would not allow regular operations of jet aircraft <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.