Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-13-2010 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 05-13-2010 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 05-13-2010 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2010 10:19:05 AM
Creation date
5/10/2010 10:18:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/13/2010
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-13-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
37 <br />Appendix C <br />Social Justice Background <br />John O. Calmore, UNC School of Law <br />February 16, 2005 <br />SOCIAL JUSTICE AS A REFLECTION OF OUR COMMUNITY CHARACTER: <br />THE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />In the autumn of 2003, a Durham newspaper reported that Democratic Party presidential candidates John Edwards <br />and Howard Dean each had promised that, if elected, he would hold a summit on social justice within 90 days of <br />taking office. ~ The two men said they would invite groups to discuss how grassroots organizing can play an <br />expanded role in solving society's problems; according to Edwards, "We have to make real, bold, dramatic moves <br />that we can really achieve." <br />Social justice is usually directed by NGOs, from Oxfam America to the Green Party, from academic and training <br />institutions to local grassroots groups. It is not an explicit goal of local governments. Orange County is thus poised <br />to make the real, bold, dramatic, and achievable moves mentioned by Edwards. Of course, here is the challenge and <br />the opportunity. Is it within the capacity and heart of the Board to advance a social justice agenda in terms of real, <br />bold, dramatic, and, most importantly, achievable goals? If the Board shies away from this format, will it <br />underachieve, perhaps doing no more than paying lip service to social justice? Few local governments take this on <br />because it is very hard to do. <br />Against this backdrop, I have been asked to address three questions: 1) what is social justice in a legal, social, and <br />historic framework? 2) How is social justice manifested? 3) How could it be manifested? As questions 2 and 3 <br />suggest, I am exploring both aprogram/policy of social justice and the aspirations embodied by social justice. <br />I. What is Social Justice? <br />Judith Shklaz has suggested that only by understanding the face of injustice can one understand justice. A socia] <br />justice goal cannot be developed at the home office and then imposed top-down on the people. We should keep this <br />in mind as we proceed. <br />Because there are many views of social justice, it is important for the Board to define the concept for itself, to tailor <br />it in a way that fits with its character and mission. Social justice is a concept largely based on various social contract <br />theories. Most variations on the concept hold that as governments are instituted among populations for the benefit of <br />members of those populations, those governments which fail to see to the welfare of their citizens are failing to <br />uphold their part in the social contract and are, therefore, unjust. The concept usually includes, but is not limited to, <br />upholding human rights; many variants also contain some statements concerning more equitable distributions of <br />wealth, power, and resources. <br />The concept of a social contract presents a good framework for striking a bargain with the community. Those <br />concerned with social justice may believe that historical inequities that cause injustice should be corrected until the <br />actual inequities no longer exist. A second belief held by some social justice proponents is that wealth, power and <br />status should be redistributed for the individual, community and societal good. Such advocates may further hold that <br />it is government's (or those who hold significant power) responsibility to ensure a basic quality of life for all <br />citizens. <br />While it is beyond my scope here to address the critique of social justice, the Board should become aware of such <br />criticism, the most prominent stemming from Friedrich Hayek.Z <br />The Social Justice Training Institute defines social justice as both a process and a goal: "The goal of social justice <br />education is full and equal participation of groups in society that is mutually shaped to meet their needs. Social <br />justice includes a vision of society that is equitable and all members are physically and psychologically safe and <br />secure."3 It is important to recognize that the vision of social justice be developed synergistically asboth aprocess <br />and goal. Goals are not self-regulating or self-implementing; attention to process is important to address legitimacy <br />and to measure efficiencies and effectiveness. <br />ORANGE COCINTYSOCIAL JI'STICE GOAL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.