Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
<br />•~ V <br />Ms. Crawford: Replied that she understood that, however, her. questions really <br />dealt with the monthly lease arrangements, etc. <br />Mr. Northern: Said that within the partnership discussion regarding that <br />question was continuing. They did not wish to be locked into either "straight <br />lease" ar that they would "sell long term lease rights or condominium ownership <br />I <br />Hof the hangar space" until they had examined .the market response and to see if <br />they could do either of the above. He added that first, they must convince all <br />those "potential buyers" that it is a "viable prpject." <br />Commissioner Gustaveson: Asked Mr. Northern if one option "could be a <br />condominium type sale." <br />Mr. Northern: Replied that one option could be .rather than a fee simple <br />sale, they would own their hangar space. "Correspondingly you would have to create <br />condominium type documents that would put a burden on everyone of those units to <br />contribute to the maintenance pro rata and the ability to enforce it...." <br />Commissioner Gustaveson: Asked what the projected operational costs were.far <br />a year. . <br />Mr. Northern: Responded that he does "not have that information." <br />Mr. Cannity told the Boards that he had a copy of Mr. Plentl's July 1, 1982, <br />letter to Mr. Polatty; he said he had not introduced it as evidence because it <br />was Mr. P]entl's opinion of the Zoning Ordinance and not evidentiary. While Mr. <br />Cannity distributed copies of the aforementioned letter, Commissioner Whitted <br />noted that Mr. Mehler had introduced the letter as evidence. <br />Commissioner Whitted told Mr. Fred Hazard'.that in checking his list of those <br />who were sworn to give evidence, he saw that"Mr. Hazard had been so sworn and <br />asked if Mr. Hazard desired to give evidence; Mr. Hazard responded that he was <br />available to answer questions but had no formal evidence to present. <br />Ms. Crawford: Asked Mr. Hazard if he knew at this point what type of operation <br />"he would be running," she specified the number of employees, construction vehicles, <br />managers, etc. <br />Mr. Hazard: Replied, "I don't have the slightest idea; we're looking at several <br />models and actual performances around the State." He noted that the University <br />had been very generous in letting him look at their operations costs and he would <br />not feel free to discuss their specifics regarding operations and costs. He added <br />that it was difficult to find a similar proposal around the State but Burlington <br />Municipal was one being examined. Mr. Hazard told Commissioner Gustaveson that it <br />did not seem to be very effective for them to go farther afield than North Carolina <br />