Minutes - 19820708 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~. i sf~ i~~~ Mr. McAdams: Said that that safety had been given a "cursory" consideration. He added that given the theorectical capacity .of that road r'the road is lightly loaded at this time." I~.r. McAdams was unsure if sight distance on the hill was a problem. 1fr. Kizer: Asked Mr. A1cAdams if he would respond to each of the concerns listed by the planning Staff (please see pages of 'this book for that 'last). I'1r. 14cAdams: ~1--1Ji11 be provided; ~~Recreation facilities will be provided including a swimming pools but he is unsure what else is included; • ~3-~-Is not aware of any proposed laundery facilities; one dumpstex is at the .site and "at least one more dumpater is proposed;" ~/~.~Idalkways avnnecting the parking areas .iri_th the buildings is proposed and when xecxeation facilities are provided .walkways connecting those facilities with the buildings would be provided; #5--the same surface pavement as those already existing there; Mr. Kizer asked if Mr. DlcAdams preferred that the roads not be "paved to State standards." Mx. McAdams replied that "I'm ta7.kiiag about what is intended by the developer. YIe've come t0 you Wa.th a rezoning request; not a Special Use Permit proppsal." #6-^-parking will be off a loop which is off the maa.n entrance drive; ~7---"Y don't ]mow what spacing has been provided." 1'he landscaping is pri- maraly.:'r-shrubbery, pine bark mulch no grass." Commissioner Flhitted asked if I4r. McAdams had designed base x and he replied "jdo.rr ~g--xs not a "development provision." Mr. Kizer: Asked Mr. 1dcAdams about his feelings for the recommendation by Planning Staff for a Planned Development for this project. 19r. McAdams: "If the zoning had not been enacted in Septembers the developer would have done ti~at we have in mind anyway and we're just asking far the rezroning so he can gv ahead and do it. ~ Tha e~dsting development down `:there pxavides the best information an what will be continued.." Mx. Caru~i-ty. Reminded th'e Boards. that this is a rezoning request. and they must weigh the merits of the project for. this zoning di.strict.in its particular location. "It xs impossible for you to weigh the intentions of the developer or an3't~.ng he says he intends to do. 1'ou need to be ready to accept the R-8 zoning with none of these things addressed. Although the developer may make the state- ments that his intentions are to dv such and Stlch.'r 1~Is. Crawford asked for audience comments iri favor of the rezoning request; there were none. I~Is. Crawford asked for audience cenments opposed to -the rezoning request, • Mr. David Rooks Attorney for residents living along Orange Grove Road, . said that there were currently 17 farm-lies living in .single units along Orange Grove Road to its intersection with Oakdale Road. He said the issue is rezoning. I