Orange County NC Website
1. <br />UU - l~t- <br />6 ~: <br />2° recently voted down, in order not to have an "unfinished, unused mess" in Bingham <br />~~ Township. She feels that the site on I-85 and U5 70 is far more appropriate than <br />~ Bingham Township. She cited concerns that if the airport is approved and is success- <br />• ful that Special Use Permits may become routine in the area, rendering it useless <br />5• for residential purposes. <br />6. Ms. Anne Gilland yield her opportunity to Mr. Wallace Kaufman who was sworn by Com- <br />7~ mission r Gustaveson (Mr. Whitted was out of the room). Mr. Kaufman presented his <br />credentials to the Boards: <br />8' I come as a real estate appraiser...rgy credentials are: I've been in <br />9~ the real estate business some 15 years. And far the past 10 years most of <br />my work has been. appraising real estate, determining values and what affects <br />ld. values and things like that. T've written about the value of real estate <br />for numerous publications and county papers; the New York Times and not- <br />11. Tonal magazines. And the kinds of clients that T've had are quite varied <br />and they range of course, from individuals to the NCNB Commercial Loand <br />12. Department, Wachovia's Trust Department, numerous lawyers in the area, the <br />Liggett Group.iri Durham...I've appraised land for OWASA, Chatham, Pittsboro, <br />1 ~~ Chapel Hill and Carrboro. And, of course, within my firm we've .specialized <br />in appraisers...we ve of course:appraised~for Hillsborough, Drange County <br />1l~. and a number of other government bodies here, Rocky Mount and all over the <br />eastern part of the State. We also appraised for the utility companies and <br />15• for people who oppose the utility companies both, which I think speaks to <br />something of our objectivity. <br />16. Mr. Kaufman said he would address the issue of the value of land adjacent to the <br />17.~~.airport. 'He said that as he understood the Special Use Permit, procedure, the - <br />1 8. Board of Commissioners, in order to grant the Special Use Permit request, would <br />_ have to find that the use either does not affect property values in the area or if <br />~'9• if does, it either maintains or enhances those property values. He said there <br />__. 20° were some questions to be asked: 1} "How do surrounding property uses react to <br />21• an airport?" He cited examples from RDU, where he said the Research Triangle Park <br />had objected "long and loudly" to expansion of.that airport; he said few subdivisions <br />2~' had been built near that airport for obvious reasons. Citing HWA, he noted the <br />2 3• residents were opposed to it being in their midst; he said if the expansion proposed <br />~4' had been granted values in the neighborhoods surrounding HWA would have dropped. <br />~5' He cited law flying military planes on North Chatham and haw Congressman Andrews <br />~6' had .intervened to stop such activity. He summed up the responses to question # <br />~7° 1 by saying that "Almost no where do residents welcome an airport." He said the . <br />28' matter of taste affected property values, the dollar value on real estate. <br />2q' 2) "What creates value in land near ttiis proposed airport?" He said that the <br />3~• most "ii,mportant" factor was the desirability of this land for residential uses. <br />31• The rural, "sparsely developed" nature of the area made it more valuable and <br />_-_32~• enhanced its-value. <br />33° 3) Given two homes, which, Mr. Kaufman asked, would you be willing to pay <br />34• more for; the one "over which planes buzzed unpredictably" or one which is in <br />35• a "quieter neighborhood?" He said that if the latter were chosen, then to put <br />36• that kind of use in an area where it.doesh't already exist, is to lower the values. <br />37. <br />3~• <br />39. <br />