Minutes - 19820308 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

X. U l had understood. With regard to 8.8.1.b he thought that with Mr. Matthews' new set of assumptions, there would be no noise problems. For 8.8.1.f there would be no problem for the developer to adapt the design with regard to public utility in case the County ever wanted to take over the airport; public money is not needed, nor sought. For the entrance road question., Mr. Mohler said Department of Transportation had told then to put the road there, the developer is willing to change to whatever is agreeable to Department of Transportation. With regard to runway width, the developer is willing to alter it; however, the runway centerline to the building restriction 1tne is "sufficient" Mr. Mohler says. For the distance between the nmway centerL;*b- and the aircraft parking area, the developer is willing to alter. The devel- oper, however, feels that the distance between the taxiway and aircraft parking area is "sufficient". For 8.8:8.1.e the architects were told not to ir4icate screening, according to Mr. Mohler. In reference to 8.8.8.1.f, Mr. Mahler said he did get a verbal assent froan EMS although no letter accompanied that response. Mr,'...Mahler's response to the recmnmided special conditions ( as listed in this book) follows: 01—Acceptable #2—He questions the severity required for some improvements, that is' other than roads and sewer; LMr. cannity said it was his intention when be wrote this to secure only improvements consid- ered public improvements; conditions 2 and 3 are taken -r'. to- gether�./ Acceptable. #4-5-6—Acceptable. #7 Acceptable. 08-9-10--Ckay (#10 the Fire Company's reservations about its fire fighting capabilities are restricted to the airpark). #11-12-13-14--Ckay. #15--Mr. McMer said the 100foot setback requirements had not been been required before, this was not part of the Zoning ordinance and he didn't know the definition of "heavily landscaped" but a promise might be worked out- #16-17—Acceptable. #18---Mr. Mahler said these may be some problem with the financing due to the high interests rates. 019MIr Mahler said the airport is FAA approved. #20—Mr. Mohler said.the 5,000 foot rumvay is safer; he is not willing to change #21—Okay. #22 Mr. Mohler said this is impossible. #23-24—Acceptable. Mr. Mahler next enumerated his differences for the airpark with regard to the findings of fact on pages of this book. For Article 8.2.1 I he disagrees that the material submitted is not competent or the evidence is insufficient to support the developer's requests. He added that land Use Plans