Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
#5---/-Clerk's note: There is no number 5, <br /> #6-- ie said that with regard to urban services, i.e..fire, water, <br /> police protection, they are willing to do whatever needs to be <br /> done; he feels they should not be grouped in with any future <br /> development. <br /> Mr. Mahler then addressed the conditlans which Planning recommended <br /> should the Boards find the development acceptable: <br /> #1-2-3-4-5-6—Acceptable. <br /> #7-50,000 gallon tank with gravity flow system is the ultimate goal <br /> with stand by pump as recommended by the Fire Department. <br /> #8-9-10--11-12-13-14-15--Acceptable. . <br /> #16--Will do whatever DOT wants. <br /> Will <br /> setbacks are excessive. <br /> 418--The developer and Mr. Mehler disagree. <br /> #19--Mr. Mahler asserts that he doesn't know why the Planning Department <br /> wants this submitted as a Planned Development Office-industrial, <br /> They do not want industrial development nor do they plan it. <br /> #20-21-22—Acceptable. <br /> Mr. Mahler concluded his presentation and response to Staff rec=mendations <br /> by saying this was a thoroughly planned project, carefully thought out. They <br /> feel this location is the best a;e available for this use and hope the case <br /> will be decided on its merits. <br /> Planning Board Member Irvin had several questions of Staff and the develop- <br /> er's representative. <br /> Mr. Irvin: Are there other sites available for a general aviation <br /> airport in Orange County? <br /> Mr. Luce: Yes, we initially surveyed,sixty-nine sites. <br /> YX. _iron: Are sage as satisfactory or more so than Midway? <br /> Mr. Luce: Yes. <br /> Mr. Irvin: Are other sites in the Land Use Plan suitable to industrial <br /> development, for example, along I-85? <br /> Mr. Luce: Yes, several. <br /> Mr. Irvin: Are some of those sites closer than the Triangle J Survey's <br /> choices; are sate closer to Durham and to,Hillsborough? <br /> Mr. Luce: Yes. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Irvin: Asked that Mr. Lure read "for the record" comments on the <br /> "Runway Approach Surfaces" from Mr. Matthews' letter. <br /> Mr. Luce: reading from Mr. Matthews' letter: <br /> 1. For Utility Airports, approach surface begins 200' beyond <br /> end of runway and slopes upward fran runway elevation at a 20 <br /> to 1 ratio (l foot vertically for 20 feet horizontally). For <br /> runways without instrument approaches, surface is 250' at run- <br /> way end,, 1,000' long, and 450' wide at outer end. For those <br /> with instrument approaches, surface is 500' by 1,000' by 8001. <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br />