Browse
Search
Minutes - 19820201
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Minutes - 19820201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 4:51:34 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/1/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-01-1982
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
poorly timed and poorly done. And ah I guess my concern is ah that at <br /> least this is part of the heart of the matter that ah this is certainly <br /> ah within their professional responsibility and administrative respon- <br /> sibility to make these judgements. That when they see,ah poorly timed <br /> and ah poor workmanship in terms of the whole project that eh they want <br /> to assure that the money that is being spent in this program is spent as <br /> wisely as possible. And ah, ah I think that as I ah look through this <br /> material that gets to the heart of the whole whole matter. And and I <br /> gather that you kind of lightly went over this fact to bring in a lot of <br /> other things that seem not to be really addressing the core issue and I <br /> think that certainly there are many ah contracts they have to evaluate <br /> many projects they have to evaluate and ah ah ah I think that this is <br /> something that needs to be addressed... <br /> Mr. Ievi (interrupting): Very well. Allow ma to address two things you've <br /> said. First of all the state that I've made light of .'I don't under- <br /> stand that—I made light of. The other you stated that it was the respon- <br /> sibility of your staff to make judgments that this might have been a <br /> T judgmental thing on my behalf. There's some conflict here. Judgment is <br /> is granted in one situation but judgment is denied in the other. I that's <br /> that's confusing.to me. The other is that the money must be spent wisely. <br /> I doubt if you car. find anyone, let me put it this way, I've been impressed <br /> with your presentations, I watch you on this Commission. I'm extremely <br /> ah pleased in fact I thought you were one of the profs at UNC. I'd like <br /> to know what you do because I'm impressed with your mannerism as a Cotmr- <br /> missioner. Iet me say this, and you will understand this I believe that <br /> money should be spent wisely and I believe that each time a hand is dipped <br /> into the Treasury of the U. S. a little democracy and accountability and <br /> responsiveness must of necessity cling to whatever the fingers take out. <br /> And I can't say it anymore, I can't say it any better when I say that I <br /> believe money should be spent wisely also. So there's no conflict between <br /> what you believe and think and what I believe and thank. There's congruency. <br /> Now, I'm going to try to address making light and you correct me if I <br /> misunderstand what you have said. .Making light I assume you mean that I <br /> have not given the proper attention and explanation to the performance of <br /> the contractor in lieu of his real performance and in lieu of the standards <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.