Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
inquiry from this letter never came. it never cane. <br /> Ommissioner Willhoit: So then it did not affect negatively the decision to <br /> allow participation? <br /> Mr. Levi: That's a value judgment. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: well, it's a fact. <br /> Mr. Ievi (interrupting): It's obvious that you haven't read the letter that <br /> he wrote, because the letter that he wrote contradicts what you are saying_ <br /> He said that the basis of denial is the information that we received from <br /> Durham. And you're saying that it didn't have a negative impact. And I'm <br /> confused in terms of plus and minuses. Hmt's plus and what's minus? <br /> Commissioner Willhoit: I'm saying that the contract was signed. <br /> Mr. Ievi: T hat's the only way he could participate. <br /> Chairman Whitted: Yes, Ms. Marshall. <br /> Commissioner Marshall: Mr. Ievi, this, is not the priority,but what the letter <br /> says. The letter that I have a copy of shows that careful review that <br /> the omirmy completed construction five days over your scheduled time limit <br /> and your company's work performance was inefficient. And it just says. . <br /> additionally we are concerned about the negative reference Fran the City <br /> of Durham's Community Development Department- <br /> Mr. Levi: Yes <br /> Commissioner Marshall: It does nOt deny the application specifically and soley <br /> or even as a criteria, it quite clearly says it is not the criterion, it <br /> just mentions concern. <br /> Mr. Ievi: Ah is that your, the letter you received from him. <br /> Chairman Whi.tted: That's the letter that went to Mr. Smith on July 16th, 1981. <br /> Mr. Levi: Yes, you're- saying it does not deny participation? <br /> Commissioner Marshall. No, I'm saying it does not deny participation as using <br /> the negative reference from the City of Durham as a criterion, it just <br /> mentions concern about that.in addition to the two criteria that were given. <br /> - Mr. Ievi: Sure, Ah. Thank you and I'd appreciate that- I weuld like to know at <br /> this point since it was mentioned, ah there was same basis for so considering <br /> it. Now, if it were not used for denial what was? And if what was used for <br /> denial was used, ,then how did that impact on the completed product? You see, <br /> in the final analysis you have a completed product. And that completed <br /> Product represents a person's satisfaction emanating from the property Owner <br />