Browse
Search
ORD-2008-109 - Zoning Atlas Amendment Rezoning: Hillsborough Area Economic Developmnent
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-109 - Zoning Atlas Amendment Rezoning: Hillsborough Area Economic Developmnent
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:41:29 AM
Creation date
5/3/2010 4:14:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
c5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Planning Board member asked clarifying questions about the wetlands and floodplain. He said <br />that he does not know how there could be small plots without covering up the stream for parking, etc. <br />Robert Davis said that there is a stream that goes up the back of the red line, which is also a buffered <br />stream. There is not a lot of buildable area here. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT: <br />Debbie Braxton is a resident of Hillsborough, but was speaking as a Real Estate agent for Audrey <br />Miller. Audrey Miller's property is listed at 2411 Old NC 86. There has been some interest in the <br />purchase of her home for a small office and her property meets both of the zoning plans, but <br />definitely meets the criteria of the proposed rezoning. The home is brick, which could be a small <br />office with parking in the back. Her client is in favor of the rezoning. <br />Sue Spaccarotella spoke on behalf of her mother, Audrey Miller. She said that her mom has <br />decided to move after 59 years and her home is on the market. She said that they are now hopeful <br />to sell the home with the amended rezoning. <br />Robert Smith was representing his mother, who owns the land where Cornwallis Hills is. His <br />mother needs to sell her property and they are in favor of the rezoning. He just wants to look out for <br />his parents. <br />Margo Pinkerton lives in Cornwallis Hills and said that she has a long history in planning. She <br />said that the idea of small offices makes perfect sense for this land but there was a proposal on this <br />property 18 months ago and the same concerns are current today. She said that one of the <br />proposed changes in the zoning involves the buffers and this concerns her. She said that one acre <br />of impervious surface produces 16 times more runoff than one acre of meadow. There is already <br />flooding at the end of the neighborhood. She showed a picture of the flooding. She said that if <br />buffers will be reduced and impervious surfaces are increased, the flooding will get worse. She <br />asked if the Planning Board had consulted with the river keepers of the Neuse River. This is a very <br />sensitive river with national sensitivity. She has concerns about parking behind buildings because <br />the police cannot see what is going on behind buildings. She would urge parking in front or beside <br />buildings. <br />Jo Soulier lives in Cornwallis Hills. She said that last year the neighbors fought a medical <br />complex because of the buffering and because the parking in the back of an office does not lend itself <br />to safety. She agreed that parking should be offset to the side. She asked that the lower piece be a <br />special tract where there is much discussion when a use comes up. <br />Member of the Planning Board also gave their comments. <br />Mary Bobbit Cooke asked how many times this area floods per year and the citizens said many <br />times in the lower section (tract 2). <br />Tommy McNeill asked clarifying questions and Robert Davis said that the impervious surface is <br />the same for both designations, but the difference is the lot size. <br />Robert Davis said that there is no requirement that parking go in the rear of the building. This is <br />an area that Hillsborough would serve with water and sewer. <br />Chair Jacobs said that there are tradeoffs here. He said that a six -story building located to the <br />east of a residential neighborhood would be a big wall between the people and the morning sun. He <br />spoke in favor of limiting access points and said that this proposal has nothing about limiting access <br />points and in fact would make road capacity worse. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.