Browse
Search
ORD-2008-108- Zoning Atlas Amendment (Rezoning) Intersection of NC 54 & White Cross Road (Davis)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-108- Zoning Atlas Amendment (Rezoning) Intersection of NC 54 & White Cross Road (Davis)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:43:50 AM
Creation date
5/3/2010 4:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
70 <br />December 18, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />Second, a concern has been expressed about the recent installation of a <br />septic system on a portion of the tract that is being requested for rezoning, <br />which septic system serves the small furniture store on the .11 acre lot zoned <br />NC -2 at the southwest intersection of NC 54 and White Cross Road. Apparently, <br />although the zoning ordinance does not address the matter, the ordinance may be <br />open to the i nterpretati on that a septi c tank system must be 1 ocated on 1 and that <br />has the same zoning as the use which the system serves. To remove this issue <br />entirely from this rezoning request, Mr. Davis is prepared to delete from this <br />rezoning request a portion of the 4.67 acre tract that is presently used for the <br />septic tank system serving the furniture store. If there is a technical <br />violation with respect to this septic area, this can easily be cured by a <br />rezoning that would add the septic area to the adjoining lot that it serves. <br />Thus, this issue should have no bearing on the present rezoning request. <br />In summary, the tract in question clearly is inappropriate for the <br />residential or agricultural uses permissible under the existing zoning, and the <br />AS zoning designation would simply provide the applicants with some additional <br />flexibility in finding a viable use for this property that would be both entirely <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan and the existing uses in this area. <br />MBB:glh <br />Sincerely, <br />MICHAE B. //B ROUGH & ASSOCIATES <br />M chael B. Brough <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.