Browse
Search
ORD-2008-108- Zoning Atlas Amendment (Rezoning) Intersection of NC 54 & White Cross Road (Davis)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-108- Zoning Atlas Amendment (Rezoning) Intersection of NC 54 & White Cross Road (Davis)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:43:50 AM
Creation date
5/3/2010 4:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-flac� men <br />MICHAEL B. BROUGH & ASSOCIATES <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />1829 E. FRANKLIN STREET. 800•A <br />MICHAEL B. BROUGH CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27514 <br />JAN S. SIMMONS <br />WILLIAM C. MORGAN, JR. <br />ALISON A. ERCA December 18, 1995 <br />Orange County Planning Board <br />306 F Revere Road <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Re: Rezoning Application of Vernon P. and Barbara S. Davis <br />Z-7-95 <br />Dear Members of the Planning Board: <br />(919) 929-39D5 <br />Pax (919) 942 -5742 <br />Mr. Vernon Davis has asked me to assist him in addressing two of the <br />concerns expressed by the planning staff in their report on this rezoning <br />request. <br />The first concern is that not all of the uses in the AS District are <br />entirely compatible with the horticultural, silvacultural and agricultural uses <br />of the AR District. The first response to this concern is that, while there may <br />be some lack of correlation between the list of permissible uses applicable to <br />the AS District and the stated purpose of the AS District, this is a matter that <br />should be dealt with generally and not in the context of this rezoning <br />application. In other words, the property in question meets all of the standards <br />of the AS District and a rezoning would therefore be consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan and should be approved. <br />Moreover, it would be particularly inappropriate to deny this application <br />on the basis of a perceived lack of correlation between the uses permitted in <br />the text of the ordinance and the statement of purpose of the AS District <br />contained in that ordinance because, unlike most areas designated as Agricultural <br />Residential, the Davis's property is located within a Rural Community Activity. <br />Node designated on the Comprehensive Plan at the intersection of NC 54 and White <br />Cross Road. Mr. Davis has apparently been precluded from applying for other <br />commercial designations for this tract because the area within this commercial <br />node already contains five acres of property zoned NC -2 and five acres of <br />property zoned LC -1, which is the maximum available under the zoning ordinance. <br />Thus, even if there is a legitimate concern that all of the uses permissible <br />within the AS district are not entirely compatible with an area that is truly <br />agricultural, this concern does not apply to the subject of this rezoning request <br />because the Comprehensive Plan already recognizes that this lot is appropriate <br />for non - agricultural and non - residential uses. In short, it is quite apparent <br />that this 4.67 acre tract, at the southwest intersection of Highway,.54.and White <br />Cross Road, is no more appropriate or likely to be used for agricultural or <br />residential purposes than the properties directly across NC 54 or White Cross <br />Road, all of which have already received a commercial zoning designation. It <br />should therefore be rezoned to allow the limited range of uses permissible within <br />the AS District. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.