Browse
Search
ORD-2008-108- Zoning Atlas Amendment (Rezoning) Intersection of NC 54 & White Cross Road (Davis)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-108- Zoning Atlas Amendment (Rezoning) Intersection of NC 54 & White Cross Road (Davis)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:43:50 AM
Creation date
5/3/2010 4:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
54 " <br />(1) That the issue of permitted uses in the AS <br />district be referred to the Ordinance Review <br />Committee following review and comment by the <br />Agricultural Districts Advisory Board, <br />Cooperative Extension, and Economic <br />Development Commission. This recommendation <br />is made because the nature of farming in the <br />County is changing and the list of permitted <br />uses should reflect identified changes; and <br />(2) That, following the resolution of the issue <br />of permitted uses, consideration be given to <br />establishing a small area planning group to <br />work with the property owners in and around <br />the White Cross activity node to prepare a <br />land use plan for the node. <br />Barrows asked for more clarification of <br />Agricultural Service Uses. Willis responded that <br />Staff would have to look at specific services to <br />determine the relationship to agriculture. She <br />continued that feed and seed stores would be a <br />good example. <br />Rosemond asked if the proposed storage /warehouse <br />was for agricultural related goods. Hinkley <br />responded that he felt that the intent of the <br />ordinance was for the storage to be agriculture <br />related. However, the listings are not.specific <br />enough to say that they are only agricultural. He <br />felt this would allow for all-types of storage or <br />warehousing. <br />Rosemond asked how farming was changing in <br />relation to agriculture services. Hinkley <br />responded that farming and agricultural uses have <br />become more mechanized and specialized. <br />Therefore, there will be more things that are <br />service oriented -in'relation .to - farming. If there <br />is to be'warehousing, it should be specifically <br />agricultural related. <br />Willis noted that there have been changes in area <br />farms due to dairy farms and tobacco farms going <br />out of business. She felt that there should be <br />review /discussion with Cooperative Extension, <br />Agricultural Districts Advisory Board to <br />determine the service needs of the changing <br />agriculture so that the ordinance can be better <br />tailored to meet those needs. <br />Katz asked why it was <br />uses is not specific <br />those uses. Hinkley <br />felt that the agricultural <br />enough to address only <br />responded that with the node <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.