Browse
Search
ORD-2008-102a - Animal Control Ordinance - Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-102a - Animal Control Ordinance - Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:52:19 AM
Creation date
4/29/2010 9:17:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-18-2008 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 11-18-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tethering Committee Report July 3&, 2007 <br />APPENDIX I:. <br />creation of the Orange Cownty Tetkernng Committee and Board of County <br />COMML siomrs' Abstract for creation of the Tednersng COl MAMee <br />0 <br />Committee Creation <br />The concerns stMM ding tethering vary greatly and include issues of both animal and public <br />welfare. Because of these concerns, the practice of tethering has become a policy issue, not only in <br />our own com numity, but in communities throughout North Carolina and around the country <br />Of particular concern are dogs that spend their lives tethered, as they are naturally social beings and <br />thrive on fivquent •interaction with humans and other animals. Additionally, there is concern that <br />tethered animals, deprived of socialisation and exercise, develop behavioral problems or aggression, <br />and as a result, pose a risk to the community through dog bites and attacks. Other concerns involve <br />the role of ted red dogs in contributing to community problems such as pet overpopulation and <br />The issue of tethering m Orange County initially surfaced from the efforts of some local animal <br />advocates, who created an area "Coalition to Unchain Dogs," and began to advocate against the <br />practice of tethering. Their efforts mirrored initiatives elsewhere to limit, restrict or outlaw <br />tethering. All of these efforts are concerned with both public safety and animal welfare. <br />The Orange County Tethering Committee was formed by the BOCC in October 2006 in response to <br />local concerns about the issue. An abstract for the creation of the 'tethering Committee appears at <br />the end of this Appendix.$ The BOCC charged the committee with: <br />• Reviewing tothwing as a policy issue and reporting on it as a means of confinement; <br />including the activities and efforts of other communities; <br />$ The issue of tdthaing was originally considered by the ASA% which created a saboommmttm to address the matter <br />The suboau mittm and and decided that it wooldmeed to bring in outside mambas of he oommunky, a fimation <br />reserved for the BOCC. it was at that time 9W the BOOC crated the Te dw ft' Committee to work in conjunction, with <br />the ASAB in deciding in what vat's, if any, ihe ardumce that governs tethaing should be chsagmL <br />16 <br />66 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.