ORD-2008-102a - Animal Control Ordinance - Tethering of Dogs

Browse Search

Il 53 Tethering Committee Report July 3&, 2007 After a six moa&bng deliberation that included seven meetings, the Orange County Teihaing Committee has concluded that the practice of tethrmg is a concern from the standpoint of both animal and human welfare. With respect to the latter, tethered dogs can pose risks to the safety of community members, and in some cir -umstances, affect their enjoyment and use of their property. With respect to the former, it may be injurious to an animal and result in isolated lives of not-so- quiet desperation at thee end of a chain or rope. Ofparticular concern are dogs that spend their lives tethered, as these are naturally active and social beings that require exercise andfr pwd interaction with humans and other animals. Additionally, the Committee is concerned that tethered animals develop behavioral problems, including aggression, that adversely affect public welfare. Notably, the Committee is recommending that tethering be limited rather than outlawed because it has concluded that there are certain ckcwnstacees under which tethering can be an acceptable method of confinement for several hours, whether the owner is in attendance or has left his or her residence for that time period. In fight of this, the Committee is recomaundmg that the County's current animal ordinance be amended to include the following with regard to tethering dogs: • a threo-bour limit within a 24 -honer period; • a specification of the types of collars and equipment that are allowed when a dog is tethered; • a requirement for minimum kennel size for outdoor housing of dogs; • an exemption for organized and lawful animal functions such as hunting, obedience training, and law enforcement training of a duration of not more than seven (7) days; • an 18 -month education period, including twelve (12) months of public outreach and six (6) months of issuing warnings before the citations would be issued. In general terms, the Committee is nuking these recommendations on the basis of these findings: • Prolonged tethering can sod does deprive dogsofnexessary exercise and socialization. • Tethered dogs can and do cenhnlRrte to various community problems, including pet overpopulation and nnisaace barking. • Tethered dogs can and do pose a risk to public safety and health because they may become aggressive and they are not confined behind a physical barrier. Ia making these recommendations, the Committee: has gathered general information about the humane and public safety aspects of tethering; researched existing ordntiances that restrict or prohibit tethering in jurisdictions across the United States; interviewed Animal Services personnel in North Carolina jurisdictions with tethering ordinances; and held two meetings to obtain public input.