Browse
Search
ORD-2008-102a - Animal Control Ordinance - Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-102a - Animal Control Ordinance - Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:52:19 AM
Creation date
4/29/2010 9:17:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-18-2008 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 11-18-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
124 <br />Tethering Cow Report <br />July 30, 2007 <br />Auer a six-mouth-long delibewation that included seven meetings, the Orange County Tethering <br />Committee has concluded that the practice of tethering is a concern from the standpoint of both <br />animal and human welfare. With respect to the latter, tethered dogs can pose risks to the safety of <br />community men* s, and in some circo, tstsnces, a&ct their enjoyment and use of their property. <br />W'dh respect to the former, it may be injurious to an animal and result in isolated lives of not -so- <br />quiet desperation at the end of a chain or rope. <br />Ofpsrtimdw concern are dogs that spend their lives tethered, as these are naturally active and social <br />beings that require exercise and fivquent interaction with humans and other animals. Additionally, <br />the Committee is concerned that tethered animals develop behavioral problems, including <br />aggression, that adversely affect public welfare. <br />Notably, the Committee is recommending that tethering be limited rather than outlawed because it <br />has concluded that there are certain circumstances under which tethering can be an acceptable <br />method of confinemert for several hours, whether the owner is in attendance or has left his or her <br />residence for that time period. <br />In light of this, the Committee is recommending that the County's current animal ordinance be <br />amended to include the following with regard to tethering dogs: <br />0 a three -hour limit within. a 24 -hour period, <br />• a specification of the types of collars and equipment that are allowed when a dog is tethered, <br />a a requirement fior minimum kennel size for outdoor housing of dogs; <br />• an cumaption for organized and lawful animal functions such as hunting, obedience training, <br />and law enforcement training of a duration of not more than seven (7) days; <br />• an 1 8-month education period, including twelve (12) months of public outreach and six (6 <br />months of issuing warnings before the citations would be issued. <br />In general terms, the Comintft is making these recommendations on the basis of these findings: <br />Prolonged tethering can and does deprive doWof necessary exercise and socialization. <br />Tethered dogs can and do contribute to various community problems, including pet <br />overpopulation and nuisance badang. <br />Tethered dogs can and do pose a risk to public safety and health because they may become <br />aggressive and they are not confined behind a physical barrier. <br />In making these recommendations, the Committee has gathered general information about the <br />humane and public safety aspects of tethering; researched existing ordinances that restrict or . <br />prohibit tethering in jurisdictions across the United States; interviewed Animal Services personnel <br />is North Carolina jurisdictions with tethering ordinances; and held two meetings to obtain public <br />input. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.