Browse
Search
ORD-2008-102a - Animal Control Ordinance - Tethering of Dogs
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-102a - Animal Control Ordinance - Tethering of Dogs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:52:19 AM
Creation date
4/29/2010 9:17:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-18-2008 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2008\Agenda - 11-18-2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tethering Committee Report <br />July 3e 2007 <br />35 78 <br />county (Scotland) has the same ordinance as the city They have a 90 percent compliance rate at tins <br />pow <br />Laurinburg also has runs on pens Sim — IOx10 for smaller dogs, 20x10 for larger. Animal <br />control wants larger requirements, but the city council has not agreed. <br />ENFORCIIV MU: 1 -hour time limit verified by sitting and watching. Violators are given a two- <br />week warning notice in general, but animal control uses discretion and will give some situations <br />more time if the dog is in good condition. Violation results in a civil citafon and $100 fine. They <br />do have the power to impound dogs and feel this has been an important tool. <br />Most people comply with the law by patting up a pen. The Humane Society has provided some <br />pens to those who cannot afford iL Those that don't comply and have their dogs impounded mist <br />pay shelter flee, vaccinations, etc. to get the dog back. Sometimes the shelter fee is waived. About <br />25 % reclaim their dog and the rest are better off anyway. <br />PHASE IN The city had a one -year education period before enforcement began. They educated the <br />community through fact sheets, newspaper. radio, posters, etc• <br />RESULTS OF ORDINANCE: Overall decrease in cruelty cases, cut down on pit bull problems, <br />decreased dog bites, and helped with overpopulation (penned dogs are not as easy to get pregnant). <br />Prior to the law, 50% of bites before were from chained dogs. No dramatic increase in surrenders <br />and no real problems with people turning their dogs loose. <br />PUBLIC REACTION: Positive — most people think chaining is cruel. Those that don't agree are <br />those whose dogs ere not well taken care of anyway. <br />Joalne McKeeL Shelter Manager <br />Catawba County Anal Care and ControL Catawba County <br />TIM LAW: Catawba does not have a ban, just requirements on conditions for tethering. <br />ENFORCMENT: They don't receive complaints very often. When they do it is because of length <br />of chain. They educate people as to why they have the m4*mcA and will write citations for <br />violators. The ten percent of body weight requirement is assessed by eyeballing the situation. <br />Some officers feel comfortable and some don't with having to make judgments on the situations. <br />No citations have been challenged <br />RESULTS OF LAW: More chaining occurs in the rural area. Approximately 90 — 95% of people <br />are compliant They have not seen an increase in animals being surrendered. More animals are <br />surrendered under the nuisance ordinance than the texhering ordinance. <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.