Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
00002 <br /> 20 2 <br /> J° <br /> Mr. Mahler said the building could not be made useable for <br /> [° the amount of money the County has budgeted for the project <br /> 6. 7 this <br /> '•--?r- He said a phase in was possible and one could build a hew. <br /> 7° courthouse, not the same ualit <br /> q Y, for the same amount of money, _ <br /> The Board asked Mr. Mahler for a breakdown of costs for items <br /> 9. which are required by law as Opposed to those renovations which <br /> "0' <br /> are optional. Mr. Mahler said he would get that information to <br /> the Board. - <br /> b. Space Builders--Mr, Blunden and Ms. Davis represented this <br /> -� firm and presented a brief profile of the firm and some previous <br /> 140 <br /> projects. <br /> 15. <br /> The architects suggested adding an addition to the south .side <br /> lo. of the Old Courthouse for an elevator <br /> i7. . and passive solar heating, this <br /> would preserve the main entrance to the Courthouse. They said <br /> 18. new mechanical, electrical systems were needed, insulation, storm <br /> 2G° <br /> windows, a handicapped ramp on the front and refinishing of exterior <br /> trim were needed as well. <br /> 21. <br /> 22. They felt the work could be done for $236,000 to $2$1,000 <br /> e3. The Board thanked the architects for their presentations. <br /> 3. Memorandum of A regiment--HSAC <br /> 24. <br /> Ms. Peggy Palli.tzer, Chair of the Human Services Advisory <br /> 2,;. Commission, addressed the Board about the Needs Assessment project. <br /> 27, She said the Needs Assessment Committee would. address four issues: <br /> 2$. l) How do current services meet demand; 2) Duplication of services; <br /> 3) Gaps in service delivery; and, 4) Availability of service- <br /> 30. <br /> Commissioner Gustaveson moved, secondgd by Commissioner Whitted, <br /> to approve the memorandum of agreement for the needs assessment study <br /> 32 and to authorize the Chair of the Board of Commissioners rs to sign. <br /> M During discussion.the date of the final report was set as no later . <br /> � than April 1, 1982, with a <br /> Preliminary report by February 28, 1982. <br /> Vote: s A e <br /> Y 5; noes, 0. <br /> 35. <br /> 5. Zoni ng Text Amendments <br /> ��. Planning Director, Jim Polatty, told the Board the <br /> �7. se were <br /> technical, not substantive changes to the Zoning Ordinance and <br /> 38° <br /> 39. were not part of the <br /> Public hearing in July_ (See pages <br /> 40. <br />