Minutes - 19811006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

�. 664 6 758 2. 3- 4,% "iz,o00 people leaving Orange County daily...seeking employment." He also 5• said the "Cheeks Advisory Council has never agreed with any LUP that would b. close down development in the I-85 Corridor." ' orridor. He was also opposed to storm - water management and stream buffer requirements. 8' Mr. Charles Blake--(Cheeks Township) He is in favor of good zoning but ='° asks that the extension of the Zoning ordinance into Cheeks be delayed. gip• I•ir. Walter McDade--(Cheeks Township) is also in favor of delaying zoning `-` into Cheeks. ' Mr. Roy McAdoo--(Cheeks Township) He is in agreement with the previous = speakers regarding zoning Cheeks; he also wants sewer lines extended there. Mr. William Farrow—(Cheeks Township). Said he didn't know of this meeting until today. He asked if it was true that if 60% of your house burned down you couldn't replace it unless you have an acre of land? =7• Mr. Cannity of the Planning Staff responded saying, that if he under- stood the question, Mr. Farrow was asking about a non-conforming structure and that if 75% of the structure was destroyed you could still replace it on ''.v. the same lot providing setback requirements were met;. that if setback require- ments could not be met., appeal was available to the Board of Adjustment. 22. Mr. Richard Dan—(Cheeks Township) Also asserted that he hadn't known 23- of this hearing until yesterday. He was opposed to zoning Cheeks Township, • saying you should be able to do anything with the land you owned. 25- Mr. Lee Settle--(Mebane, but a landowner in Cheeks) Said the County was 26. increasing regulations at the time the Federal Government was decreasing them; 27. he asked the Board not to zone Cheeks Township for at least twenty-five more 's• years. He said the intent of the Zoning Ordinance, as stated in the Ordinance, `=9° when applied to Cheeks Township was ridiculous. 30' Mr. Lindsey Efland--(Cheeks Township)He said. he didn't remember the 31, Cheeks Advisory Council approving the LUP which had the Eno River Watershed or proposed Cane Creek Resevoir on it. He said he felt the fundamental issue was "whether or not the Water Resources Task Force Report was going to be incor- porated into the LUP." He said this report does not consider economic impli- cations; he feels that a task force to consider the economic issues should be �J. appointed. He asked the Water Resources Task force Report not be included in 37° the Land Use Plan. 38- Mr. Carson Thomas--(Cheeks Township) He is also opposed to zoning Cheeks. 39. Mr. Carl Walters--(Border of Cheeks 5 Cedar Grove)said that there 40-