Minutes - 19810908 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

e e e 3 5~~ Agenda Itan 7: Riveredc~e subdivision Mr. Eddie Kixk, of Planning Staff, made the presentation to the Board regarding Riveredge Subdivision. Coannissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Ccnmissianer 4~iitted, to refer this subdivision back to the Hillsborouc~ planning ward with the question of whether or not that Plan- ning Board had ocnsidered the potential impact this subdivision might have on Iaks Ben Johnson. The Planning Director was instzucted to write such . a letter to the Aillsbarough. Planning Board expressing the Board of Ccm- missioners' carioerns and to share the Hillsborough Planning Board's cents with this Hoard. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. Agenda Item 9: Building Pee s~-r~,~~e '12~e Planning Director, Mr. Jim Polatty, presented the srhedu].e to the Boatid, stating that Alternative 3 was Planning Staff's reca~unendation. He further said he hoped to cross train inspectors and thereby cut costs. The Board voiced conoern over the costs of construction, noting the cum- mulative effect of various costs, i.e. subdivision fees, Health Depart- ment fees and the number of inspectors needed. Cumussioner Willhoit moved adoption of ~,~h_a._n; ~a 1 Fees in Schedule J and K, in Alternative 1; Ca~d.ssioner G~staveson seccmded the motion. Voss: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. (See page of this book for those fees). Commissioner Willhoit moved, seocnded by C[mnissioner Gustaveson, adoption of the ~ditional Inspection Fee, Alternative 1 ($20.00). Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. Cata~issioner WiLlhoit moved adoption of the Miscellaneous Inspections that do not fa11 within the inspecticm fee at the $20.00 rate; he with- drew his motion. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seed by Ccannissioner C~astaveson, adoption of Alternative 1, Schedule AHC and D. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. Zt1e Planning and Finance Directors were asked to prepare a fiscal analysis of what "these regulations, mist of them frc¢n the State, are ocsting people to develop and to build" and how that ~ ~*x3s to what the County is subsidizing and what the individuals are asked tv contri- bute. Ms. Battern and Mr. Polatty were also asked to ~.re the County's costs with those costs of other counties and towns and the impact of those costs with regard to total costs, development costs. health depaz-tm?nt fees and tying antc various water and sewer lines.