Orange County NC Website
e <br /> • Commissioner Willhoit questioned Section 2.2.6 regarding the rules <br /> • of procedure for the Planning Hoard and the Board of Commissioners asked <br /> • the county Attorney to clarify what constitutes rules of procedure for <br /> • the conduct of a meeting. <br /> . Commissioner Willhoit moved that Section 7.1, paragraph 3, line four <br /> • down, be changed to specify "that portion of the Upper Eno watershed as <br /> designated Tn '''° --do=t--d T Win'- *Jse Plan.° M J or. died for lack of a <br /> • second however, the Board expressed a consensus that the Planning Staff <br /> institute that change. <br /> Camu ssioner Matted moved that language indicating that the Board <br /> of Commissioners "encourages" or "strongly encourages" the planned develop- <br /> ment concept as the preferred method of development be struck; Ccmmissioner <br /> Barnes seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes, 4 (Commissioners Barnes, Walker, <br /> omitted and Willhoit), noes, 1 (Commissioner Gustaveson) . <br /> C m nissioner-Wi.l7hoi t referred to page 22.29 regarding service stations <br /> and moved to require service stations provide water for radiators, air <br /> for tires and bathroom facilities.. Motion died for lack of a second. Mr. <br /> Polatty told Cannissioner Willhoit that would result in making existing <br /> stations non-conforniing; however, it could be required that new stations <br /> provide those services. <br /> Cn page 22.35 referring to the definition of variance, the Board <br /> instructed "literal" be inserted in "...relaxation of the 'literal' terms...." <br /> Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Ahitted, to <br /> approve the Zoning Cr inance Text as amended tonight and in the past. Upon <br /> the advice of the County Attorney, Cam"Issioners Willhoit and Mitted <br /> accepted an ammmmdrnnt to their motion and second, that is Section 2.3.6.1 c, <br /> paragraph 2 reads the same as Section 8.2 c, to delete Section 8.2.c. <br /> The County Attorney further advised the Board to delete Section 8.2.2, <br /> saying the concept needed clarifying; be did not understand it as it is <br /> worded. r^^.*_Tdssioner Barnes offered a friendly amerx2ment to Commissioner <br /> Wi1]hoit's original motion to adopt; that is, to delete this Section 8.2.3 <br /> and to reserve it for rewording at a later date; Commissioner Whitted seconded <br /> the motion to amend. Vote on Commissioner Barnes' friendly amendment: Ayes, <br /> 4 (Camnissioners Barnes, Gustaveson, Whitted and Willhoit); noes, 1 (cam- <br />