Orange County NC Website
Eyffl <br />REPORT FROM ORANGE COUNTY <br />SCHOOL FUNDING OPTIONS TASK FORCE <br />March 23, 2000 <br />Introduction <br />Attachment la <br />In considering their goals for the 1999 -2000 fiscal year, the Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />recognized the importance of striking the appropriate balance between many worthy, competing needs for <br />County funding in future annual operating budgets. The Commissioners' 1999 -2000 goal for "Effective <br />and Efficient School Funding" included the task of preparation by staff of recommendations for <br />"parameters that can be established to guide development of school current expense budgets for FY2000- <br />2001 and beyond ". The Budget Director researched this topic and presented a report (Attachment 1) in <br />August 1999 which outlines a number of models the Board of Commissioners might wish to consider in <br />providing guidance to the County Manager concerning school funding for the 2000 -2001 budget. <br />The options developed by County staff were discussed in December 1999 in a joint meeting between the <br />Board of Commissioners and the two school boards. School board members suggested convening a work <br />group composed of school board members and Commissioners to review those options and to make <br />recommendations to the Commissioners. <br />In January 2000, the Board appointed a short- duration School Funding Options Task Force, consisting of <br />two members each of the Board of Commissioners, the Orange County Board of Education, and the <br />Chapel Hill - Carrboro Board of Education. The County Manager, the Orange County Schools (OCS) <br />Superintendent, the Chapel Hill - Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Superintendent, and appropriate staff <br />provided support to the Task Force. The Task Force met twice in February 2000. <br />Major Points of Discussion <br />A wide range of issues was identified during the two task force meetings. A number of points of <br />disagreement were not resolved, and not all views were mutually held, but all were aired in an atmosphere <br />that was attentive, constructive, and respectful of other participants. Following is a list of the most <br />significant points of discussion: <br />1. School representatives expressed the school systems' appreciation for past support from the BOCC. <br />2. All parties agreed that education has historically been the highest priority in Orange County. <br />3. School representatives have concerns about the impacts of mandates and fear some kind of cap would <br />have an adverse impact on their responsibility to meet them. Schools and the County have different <br />definitions of what constitutes a mandate. The County tends to view a "mandate" as a program or <br />function that is required by state or federal law; failure to provide such a program or function engages <br />penalties or sanctions. School board representatives recognize legal mandates but also speak of <br />mandates that, from their perspective, are required to carry out their charge to best serve the students <br />of the school system. <br />