Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-23-2000 - 4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 03-23-2000
>
Agenda - 03-23-2000 - 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2013 2:35:26 PM
Creation date
4/19/2010 9:56:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/23/2000
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 03-23-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL FUNDING OPTIONS TASK FORCE <br />February 28, 2000 <br />At the initial meeting of this task force on February 15, it was agreed that each parry in these <br />discussions should consider compiling a list of questions their constituents might reasonably pose <br />regarding school funding parameters. A few questions /points to ponder from the County's perspective <br />follow: <br />• What do the schools see as a proportionally fair share of the County budget to be earmarked for <br />education? <br />• What relative average annual increase in education funding do the schools think can realistically be <br />sustained every year? <br />• To what extent should the BOCC feel bound to address increases necessitated by Board of <br />Education initiatives, especially those implemented without consultation/endorsement from the <br />BOCC (e.g. class size reductions, teacher pay supplement enhancements, etc)? <br />• Do the schools have some expectation that the BOCC should find the money needed to sustain <br />average annual increases in education funding without regard to their impact on the tax rate? <br />• Is it reasonable to spend more on current expense in a year when there will be a decrease in debt <br />service for education? Conversely, is it reasonable to tighten up on current expense funding in <br />years when education debt service is increasing? <br />• What guidance (if any) is disseminated to the budget requester level from individual school <br />administration or from the central administration at the outset of each budget cycle, particularly <br />with regard to any constraints that may need to be observed in developing requests? <br />• Since the 1980s, the school systems have lived with a defined amount (based primarily on <br />anticipated half cent sales tax revenue) of annual capital outlay funding in the ten year CIP. <br />Unfunded needs have been identified during the CIP process and the most important needs <br />addressed ultimately through other mechanisms (e.g. bond issues). Is it feasible to have some kind <br />of ballpark figure for total school funding, with exceptional needs to be addressed by some <br />exceptional measure (e.g. district tax, a BOCC decision to increase funding for a specific need, <br />etc)? <br />• Is there any value in directing the Manager to shape the County's recommended budget based on <br />the parameters approved by the BOCC, but leaving room for the school boards to make a case for <br />additional funding for critical, unfunded needs? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.