Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-20-2010 - 4f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 04-20-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-20-2010 - 4f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2015 3:54:49 PM
Creation date
4/16/2010 11:45:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/20/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4f
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-20-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.1 <br />•Master Plan rationale: <br />— Facilities in keeping with the natural setting, conservation easements, cultural & <br />archaeological resources, safe access <br />*Facility priorities (2 phases) <br />"Issues for further study <br />Commissioner Pelissier asked how the contributions of the four entities were decided <br />as far as funding goes. Dave Stancil said that with the 43 acres purchased by the partners, <br />there was a formula created but the grants they finally received for this project reduced the <br />costs dramatically. He said that there was more of a negotiation between the entities <br />regarding funding and Durham County took the lead in the acquisition. <br />Rich Shaw said that the County's share was about $125,000. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the way the purchase was negotiated was related to a <br />number of factors. For example, Orange County had just purchased seven acres that were to <br />go into the preserve. <br />Commissioner Hemminger asked about the management of the park. Dave Stancil <br />said that the expectation is that the two counties (Orange and Durham) would take the lead in <br />the operation and management of the site. <br />Frank Clifton said that the park is surrounded mostly by Durham County residents. <br />Commissioner Hemminger said that she is a little concerned about the closing of <br />Pickett Road and she said that this would be a big battle to fight at this time because there is <br />an issue of connectivity. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that one complicated factor in how the park is run is that <br />Durham County does not have a parks department and Durham City is a small partner in this <br />process. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that if Pickett Road were closed, the fact that traffic would <br />go on Randolph Road would be a topic of discussion. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to <br />approve the Manager's recommendation: <br />1. Refer the master plan to the Recreation and Parks Advisory Council, Commission <br />for the Environment, and Orange Unified Transportation Board, requesting <br />feedback and comments on the relevant components of the master plan by <br />February 1, 2010; <br />2. Direct staff to develop more - detailed recommendations on the Pickett Road, <br />operation and management, and TLC property questions for subsequent Board <br />discussion, and <br />3. Ask the Clerk to schedule an opportunity to discuss the master plan and next steps <br />with the Durham County Board of Commissioners, Chapel Hill Town Council, and <br />Durham City Council during 2010. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. Environmental Responsibility Goal — Status Report <br />David Stancil presented this item. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.